Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Indie Games Are Not More Focused. They Are Differently Focused.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8314677" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>No, I was referring to exactly that. DnD doesn't rely on that, it just includes it as the "easiest way to play". To me, reliance on something means that the thing in question cannot be done without the thing supposedly relied upon. I've run DnD with 3 players and no DM, creating the world as we played. I've done it in a very freeform manner, simply improvising the world based on how we built our characters and then on how we played them and what we needed the world to be in order to do the thing we are trying to do or establish the thing about our character we are trying to establish. I've a friend who does it by borrowing from AW and BiTD, but I haven't played in that game. </p><p></p><p>We used the "This Is Your Life" chapter of Xanathar's, hacked somewhat using Heroes of The Feywild from 4e, to create characters, and used those prompts to create what turned into a small island kingdom in which we were starting out, simply going turn by turn to keep things simple until we had characters with all the bits filled in, and each had at least 2 contacts within the world, one chosen by the player and one chosen by the other two players. </p><p></p><p>Then we played dnd. Random hook generators are easy to find, but our first adventure was just me saying, "There's a festival of lights and masks going all week, so the capital is crowded with celebrants and people trying to make money off them" and then the next person said, "And we're here to stage an event that will upset people and direct that upset at the foreign governor" because that tied it into her backstory and a shared love of the book Tigana, and we went from there. </p><p></p><p>Thing is, "is there a chance of failure and consequences for failure?" is 99% of the time quite obvious to everyone at the table. The DMG has suggested DCs. Fail forward, yes and, success with complication, all allow for less need to even think about arguing with adjudication. Whoever isn't acting can determine how hard something is, and even CR is just a guideline, not an actual rule. Just make it up. We had a chart for what HP range, to-hit range, and average damage, a creature should have when coming up against us at a given level, and just used that to quick-and-dirty sketch enemies and other NPCs. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying it's not something that could use fleshing out and possibly a chapter or two in a book to really work well for new players, but we didn't have to change any of DnD's rules to do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 8314677, member: 6704184"] No, I was referring to exactly that. DnD doesn't rely on that, it just includes it as the "easiest way to play". To me, reliance on something means that the thing in question cannot be done without the thing supposedly relied upon. I've run DnD with 3 players and no DM, creating the world as we played. I've done it in a very freeform manner, simply improvising the world based on how we built our characters and then on how we played them and what we needed the world to be in order to do the thing we are trying to do or establish the thing about our character we are trying to establish. I've a friend who does it by borrowing from AW and BiTD, but I haven't played in that game. We used the "This Is Your Life" chapter of Xanathar's, hacked somewhat using Heroes of The Feywild from 4e, to create characters, and used those prompts to create what turned into a small island kingdom in which we were starting out, simply going turn by turn to keep things simple until we had characters with all the bits filled in, and each had at least 2 contacts within the world, one chosen by the player and one chosen by the other two players. Then we played dnd. Random hook generators are easy to find, but our first adventure was just me saying, "There's a festival of lights and masks going all week, so the capital is crowded with celebrants and people trying to make money off them" and then the next person said, "And we're here to stage an event that will upset people and direct that upset at the foreign governor" because that tied it into her backstory and a shared love of the book Tigana, and we went from there. Thing is, "is there a chance of failure and consequences for failure?" is 99% of the time quite obvious to everyone at the table. The DMG has suggested DCs. Fail forward, yes and, success with complication, all allow for less need to even think about arguing with adjudication. Whoever isn't acting can determine how hard something is, and even CR is just a guideline, not an actual rule. Just make it up. We had a chart for what HP range, to-hit range, and average damage, a creature should have when coming up against us at a given level, and just used that to quick-and-dirty sketch enemies and other NPCs. I'm not saying it's not something that could use fleshing out and possibly a chapter or two in a book to really work well for new players, but we didn't have to change any of DnD's rules to do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Indie Games Are Not More Focused. They Are Differently Focused.
Top