Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
individual fun VS party needs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elder-Basilisk" data-source="post: 1662575" data-attributes="member: 3146"><p>If the other players are so concerned about the lack of a particular character type, why don't <strong>they</strong> ditch <strong>their</strong> characters to bring one in? If they don't care enough to give up their character concepts, why should you give up yours? If they can't even be bothered to take leadership and get a cohort to fill that role, why should you ditch your character. (And in your particular case, a mystic theurge is probably a better contributor than either a single-classed cleric or wizard in a party where he's the only spellcaster. Mystic theurge types can be competent and fill certain spellcasting roles well. With a sorceror, you'd have no cleric type character. With a cleric, you'd lack the battlefield control capabilities of a wizard. With a mystic theurge, you've a bit of both; the party with no other spellcasters seems the ideal situation for a mystic theurge not a situation you'd want to ditch him in favor of a different character).</p><p></p><p>A party can survive without members who fill particular roles (I won't count the number of Living Campaign adventures I've played without one or two of the main character roles--I must have played over a half-dozen sessions at 14th level without a cleric and I've played numerous sessions without a rogue and dozens of sessions without an artillery wizard). The players just need to adapt their strategies to take advantage of their strengths and to minimize their weaknesses. And, to a certain degree, they need to be lucky as well.</p><p></p><p>When I have joined existing campaigns, I generally look at what the party is missing and try to fill one of those roles. But I do that because there are several types of characters I enjoy playing and looking at party balance helps me decide which of those several potential characters I actually want to play. I don't do it because I feel some obligation to fill the empty spots on the party's roster. I play the game for fun and if a role wouldn't be fun to fill, it will have to go unfilled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elder-Basilisk, post: 1662575, member: 3146"] If the other players are so concerned about the lack of a particular character type, why don't [b]they[/b] ditch [b]their[/b] characters to bring one in? If they don't care enough to give up their character concepts, why should you give up yours? If they can't even be bothered to take leadership and get a cohort to fill that role, why should you ditch your character. (And in your particular case, a mystic theurge is probably a better contributor than either a single-classed cleric or wizard in a party where he's the only spellcaster. Mystic theurge types can be competent and fill certain spellcasting roles well. With a sorceror, you'd have no cleric type character. With a cleric, you'd lack the battlefield control capabilities of a wizard. With a mystic theurge, you've a bit of both; the party with no other spellcasters seems the ideal situation for a mystic theurge not a situation you'd want to ditch him in favor of a different character). A party can survive without members who fill particular roles (I won't count the number of Living Campaign adventures I've played without one or two of the main character roles--I must have played over a half-dozen sessions at 14th level without a cleric and I've played numerous sessions without a rogue and dozens of sessions without an artillery wizard). The players just need to adapt their strategies to take advantage of their strengths and to minimize their weaknesses. And, to a certain degree, they need to be lucky as well. When I have joined existing campaigns, I generally look at what the party is missing and try to fill one of those roles. But I do that because there are several types of characters I enjoy playing and looking at party balance helps me decide which of those several potential characters I actually want to play. I don't do it because I feel some obligation to fill the empty spots on the party's roster. I play the game for fun and if a role wouldn't be fun to fill, it will have to go unfilled. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
individual fun VS party needs
Top