Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Influence Action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9426018" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Except using their intelligence modifier as a DC, which isn't the fixed DC. </p><p></p><p>And they never stated anywhere that no other DC is possible, or that no other modifiers can be added or subtracted.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are pointing at a rule that FINALLY gives us some concrete things to work with, and declaring that WoTC wants a death to all creative play because it didn't explicitly state that the DM who can change any rule in the book, and is constantly told they can change any rule in the book, can change the number of the DC. </p><p></p><p>And I am just looking back in the old 2014 PHB, and seeing every single place where they were vague with this stuff in the past. Like the Jumping rules that let you jump "further" with an athletics check. How much further? What DC? They never told us. And we complained about these things and asked for these DCs <em>constantly</em>.</p><p></p><p>Now they are telling us these things. DC 15 is the standard DC for most checks. And that is a problem for you, because despite the fact you will never once let that stop you from doing whatever you want, you are declaring that it is now impossible for anyone to ever have thought or nuance about these options. And if they hadn't given a DC? If they had just stated "you can use the persuasion skill to influence someone. Full DM discretion on the DC" you would likely be EQUALLY fervent in how lazy they are in putting all the work on the DM and not providing any DCs for us to base things on.</p><p></p><p>Do they seriously need to state, next to every single rule in the entire book "unless your DM decides otherwise"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9426018, member: 6801228"] Except using their intelligence modifier as a DC, which isn't the fixed DC. And they never stated anywhere that no other DC is possible, or that no other modifiers can be added or subtracted. You are pointing at a rule that FINALLY gives us some concrete things to work with, and declaring that WoTC wants a death to all creative play because it didn't explicitly state that the DM who can change any rule in the book, and is constantly told they can change any rule in the book, can change the number of the DC. And I am just looking back in the old 2014 PHB, and seeing every single place where they were vague with this stuff in the past. Like the Jumping rules that let you jump "further" with an athletics check. How much further? What DC? They never told us. And we complained about these things and asked for these DCs [I]constantly[/I]. Now they are telling us these things. DC 15 is the standard DC for most checks. And that is a problem for you, because despite the fact you will never once let that stop you from doing whatever you want, you are declaring that it is now impossible for anyone to ever have thought or nuance about these options. And if they hadn't given a DC? If they had just stated "you can use the persuasion skill to influence someone. Full DM discretion on the DC" you would likely be EQUALLY fervent in how lazy they are in putting all the work on the DM and not providing any DCs for us to base things on. Do they seriously need to state, next to every single rule in the entire book "unless your DM decides otherwise"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Influence Action
Top