Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Influence Action
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9426416" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Great! I want gameplay where strategy and effort actually matter. I don't want "gameplay" (if you can even call it such) that can be entirely summed up with "manipulate the DM into agreement."</p><p></p><p>Both of us can be happy here, so long as we can accept that limiting the game rules to literally nothing whatever except "DM says" is not a viable path forward.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, 100%. 5.0 went out of its way to actively piss on 4e ideas, content, and playstyle. The "big tent" did not in any way extend to 4e. 5.5e has done nothing to change this.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Weapon masteries would be much closer to weapon <em>properties</em> from 4e, seeing as how several (most?) of them are passive effects, like Graze (damage on a miss), Sap (impose attack disadvantage), Push (no-save forced movement), etc. They aren't the worst thing ever, but it's definitely a day late and a dollar short, if you catch my meaning.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah. I heard this exact same excuse during and after the D&D Next playtest. First I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because all the classes weren't out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because the "tactical combat module" hadn't come out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because the final packet hadn't come out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because the books weren't out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion for 1-2 years after the books had released.</p><p></p><p>I refuse to be told I can't evaluate things as they stand now and make an informed, reasonable opinion. Especially since all the people (<em>numerous</em> people) who told me the above <em>swore</em> I'd change my mind about 5e if I just waited for the newest moved goalpost. Not only did I not do so, I simply saw things get worse and worse.</p><p></p><p>5.5e is 5.0 with some class tweaks and the tiniest of concessions to help make martial characters suck less. It is an edition revision extremely comparable to 3.0→3.5, and WotC refusing to accept that as such is simply a marketing plot to avoid saying true things that upset fans when spoken aloud. It is not, in any way, bringing 4e into the big tent.</p><p></p><p>Call me when they actually add skill challenges or a <em>real</em> Warlord, rather than the $#!†-awful, cadaverous caricatures they've paraded before us in a grotesque pantomime.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9426416, member: 6790260"] Great! I want gameplay where strategy and effort actually matter. I don't want "gameplay" (if you can even call it such) that can be entirely summed up with "manipulate the DM into agreement." Both of us can be happy here, so long as we can accept that limiting the game rules to literally nothing whatever except "DM says" is not a viable path forward. Yes, 100%. 5.0 went out of its way to actively piss on 4e ideas, content, and playstyle. The "big tent" did not in any way extend to 4e. 5.5e has done nothing to change this. Weapon masteries would be much closer to weapon [I]properties[/I] from 4e, seeing as how several (most?) of them are passive effects, like Graze (damage on a miss), Sap (impose attack disadvantage), Push (no-save forced movement), etc. They aren't the worst thing ever, but it's definitely a day late and a dollar short, if you catch my meaning. Nah. I heard this exact same excuse during and after the D&D Next playtest. First I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because all the classes weren't out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because the "tactical combat module" hadn't come out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because the final packet hadn't come out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion because the books weren't out yet. Then I wasn't allowed to form an opinion for 1-2 years after the books had released. I refuse to be told I can't evaluate things as they stand now and make an informed, reasonable opinion. Especially since all the people ([I]numerous[/I] people) who told me the above [I]swore[/I] I'd change my mind about 5e if I just waited for the newest moved goalpost. Not only did I not do so, I simply saw things get worse and worse. 5.5e is 5.0 with some class tweaks and the tiniest of concessions to help make martial characters suck less. It is an edition revision extremely comparable to 3.0→3.5, and WotC refusing to accept that as such is simply a marketing plot to avoid saying true things that upset fans when spoken aloud. It is not, in any way, bringing 4e into the big tent. Call me when they actually add skill challenges or a [I]real[/I] Warlord, rather than the $#!†-awful, cadaverous caricatures they've paraded before us in a grotesque pantomime. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Influence Action
Top