Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Initiative and Timing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pukunui" data-source="post: 5370609" data-attributes="member: 54629"><p>Because of the segmented nature of the Initiative order, I feel it's hard to pull off action scenes involving carefully timed sequences and/or "forced movement" during combat encounters.</p><p></p><p>I'm running a Star Wars Saga Edition game, so I'll use a SW movie scene as an example: the climactic duel at the end of <em>The Phantom Menace</em> sees Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan chase Maul through a series of force fields that activate at regular intervals, cutting the combatants off from each other at inopportune times in order to heighten the drama.</p><p></p><p>I have no idea how to replicate that scene in my game. I could maybe pull it off outside of combat, but I don't know how I'd incorporate it into a turn-based combat encounter.</p><p></p><p>It seems like the way WotC handles it is to give these sorts of things their own Initiative count(s), but I'm not sure how well that would work in this instance. In order to pull off the sort of thing we see in the movie, I think you'd need to have the force fields acting independently of the Initiative order, perhaps even acting on the individual characters' turns.</p><p></p><p>Either that or you'd need to carefully engineer it so the corridor was just too long for someone to double-move all the way through and then you'd need to make sure your NPC starts his turn several squares ahead of the chasing PCs, so that even if you have both the NPC and the PCs act before the forcefield during the Initiative order, the PCs will still be end up far enough away from the NPC that the forcefield can activate in between them. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Another awkward one would be something like the conveyor belt scene in <em>Attack of the Clones</em>. I guess you could just have everyone move a certain number of squares along the conveyor belt at the beginning of each round - or, I suppose you could make it so that you can move at 2x your speed if going in the direction that the conveyor is going, but only half speed if you're going against it (that would be to show movement relative to anything/anyone not on the conveyor belt). But that's still kind of awkward.</p><p><em>EDIT: Interestingly enough, according to the SWSE supplement, </em>Galaxy at War<em>, this is exactly how you do it: moving with the belt is 2x speed, against it is half-speed. It also adds an Acrobatics check to avoid being flat-footed while on the belt.</em></p><p></p><p>I know this sort of thing is partly just a sacrifice you have to make when using turn-based combat, but it still rubs me the wrong way sometimes. Like when doing a chase scene. Instead of actually having one character moving simultaneously with another character, you have this sort of fits-and-starts thing where one character moves away, the other catches up, then the first one moves ahead again, then the other catches up again (and each time the first character tries to break away, the chasing character gets to make an AoO - whereas if they were both moving simultaneously, that might not happen). It's awkward but I don't know how else you'd do it.</p><p></p><p>I suppose maybe you could break up Initiative into a "movement round" and an "action round" but even that is unwieldy and awkward.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Jonathan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pukunui, post: 5370609, member: 54629"] Because of the segmented nature of the Initiative order, I feel it's hard to pull off action scenes involving carefully timed sequences and/or "forced movement" during combat encounters. I'm running a Star Wars Saga Edition game, so I'll use a SW movie scene as an example: the climactic duel at the end of [I]The Phantom Menace[/I] sees Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan chase Maul through a series of force fields that activate at regular intervals, cutting the combatants off from each other at inopportune times in order to heighten the drama. I have no idea how to replicate that scene in my game. I could maybe pull it off outside of combat, but I don't know how I'd incorporate it into a turn-based combat encounter. It seems like the way WotC handles it is to give these sorts of things their own Initiative count(s), but I'm not sure how well that would work in this instance. In order to pull off the sort of thing we see in the movie, I think you'd need to have the force fields acting independently of the Initiative order, perhaps even acting on the individual characters' turns. Either that or you'd need to carefully engineer it so the corridor was just too long for someone to double-move all the way through and then you'd need to make sure your NPC starts his turn several squares ahead of the chasing PCs, so that even if you have both the NPC and the PCs act before the forcefield during the Initiative order, the PCs will still be end up far enough away from the NPC that the forcefield can activate in between them. Another awkward one would be something like the conveyor belt scene in [I]Attack of the Clones[/I]. I guess you could just have everyone move a certain number of squares along the conveyor belt at the beginning of each round - or, I suppose you could make it so that you can move at 2x your speed if going in the direction that the conveyor is going, but only half speed if you're going against it (that would be to show movement relative to anything/anyone not on the conveyor belt). But that's still kind of awkward. [I]EDIT: Interestingly enough, according to the SWSE supplement, [/I]Galaxy at War[I], this is exactly how you do it: moving with the belt is 2x speed, against it is half-speed. It also adds an Acrobatics check to avoid being flat-footed while on the belt.[/I] I know this sort of thing is partly just a sacrifice you have to make when using turn-based combat, but it still rubs me the wrong way sometimes. Like when doing a chase scene. Instead of actually having one character moving simultaneously with another character, you have this sort of fits-and-starts thing where one character moves away, the other catches up, then the first one moves ahead again, then the other catches up again (and each time the first character tries to break away, the chasing character gets to make an AoO - whereas if they were both moving simultaneously, that might not happen). It's awkward but I don't know how else you'd do it. I suppose maybe you could break up Initiative into a "movement round" and an "action round" but even that is unwieldy and awkward. Thoughts? Thanks, Jonathan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Initiative and Timing
Top