Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Innovations I'd like to keep in 5E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="P1NBACK" data-source="post: 5878951" data-attributes="member: 83768"><p>At random? It's pretty specific actually. In fact, the problem with early saves is it might be TOO specific. So, this whole "random" argument is entirely BS. </p><p></p><p>And, what you're missing is that Fort / Ref / Will doesn't account for @<strong>DMKastmaria</strong> arguments at all. </p><p></p><p>The main benefit of earlier saves is that it WASN'T unified. So, the Thief could have just as good of a Save vs. Poison as the Fighter. </p><p></p><p>Why? Because the Thief is good at dodging poison attacks. The Fighter on the other hand is just plain tougher. </p><p></p><p>In the F/R/W crap, we have to deal with the Thief who SUCKS at Poison saves because it's all rooted in Con and can't take into account anything else. And, the Fighter who BLOWS at Will saves because it only takes into account his Charisma or Wisdom or whatever. With the old school saves, a Fighter could use the same saving throw and be good at it for different reasons. So, each class can be taken on its own merits and tied to save numbers that make sense for that class. </p><p></p><p>There are benefits and downsides to each. </p><p></p><p>But, to try and claim F/R/W is <em>inherently </em>better is just bogus. You seem to do this a lot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="P1NBACK, post: 5878951, member: 83768"] At random? It's pretty specific actually. In fact, the problem with early saves is it might be TOO specific. So, this whole "random" argument is entirely BS. And, what you're missing is that Fort / Ref / Will doesn't account for @[B]DMKastmaria[/B] arguments at all. The main benefit of earlier saves is that it WASN'T unified. So, the Thief could have just as good of a Save vs. Poison as the Fighter. Why? Because the Thief is good at dodging poison attacks. The Fighter on the other hand is just plain tougher. In the F/R/W crap, we have to deal with the Thief who SUCKS at Poison saves because it's all rooted in Con and can't take into account anything else. And, the Fighter who BLOWS at Will saves because it only takes into account his Charisma or Wisdom or whatever. With the old school saves, a Fighter could use the same saving throw and be good at it for different reasons. So, each class can be taken on its own merits and tied to save numbers that make sense for that class. There are benefits and downsides to each. But, to try and claim F/R/W is [I]inherently [/I]better is just bogus. You seem to do this a lot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Innovations I'd like to keep in 5E
Top