Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Input wanted on home brew race
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paradox42" data-source="post: 2902342" data-attributes="member: 29746"><p>Random factors in racial traits (I'm thinking specifically of the "1d10 for Large size" thing here) are generally a bad thing rules-wise, because they're difficult to balance. Some players can get lucky and have the good stuff, while others miss out. I'd recommend splitting the race into two races, one Medium-size and one Large (probably with slightly higher LA).</p><p></p><p>That said, I strongly disagree with WotC's stance that Large size must always mean LA +1 for a race- in my own games I've used homebrew races of Large size for years, and have never found the extra abilities to be unbalancing compared with some other abilities such as, say, built-in attack powers (Maenad and Dromite from the XPH leap to mind) or Flight (which, IMO, is also wildly overestimated in WotC books if it's winged flight with low maneuverability).</p><p></p><p>The only truly powerful ability that Large creatures have, compared with Medium, is their extra reach, and you can easily reduce that to 5 feet with a racial feature if you want to. Without 10 foot reach, Large size is actually more of a disadvantage than an advantage. They get penalties to AC and attack rolls, have more spaces they can be attacked from, and can't fit into spaces as small as their Medium companions can enter. While most Large-size monsters have more HD than Medium creatures, that's not part of the RAW for creature sizes- and even though the Monster Manual creature size change rules mandate increased STR, CON, and natural armor going from Medium to Large there's nothing that forces you to obey them. So the size, in isolation, is not in and of itself worth a Level Adjustment (unless you believe in negative LA I suppose <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ).</p><p></p><p>Keep the above in mind when making your Large-size Bull, and see what you come up with. Maybe it'll even be worth discarding the Medium version altogether- you've already decided to give them a LA of at least +1, so why not jump in with both feet?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paradox42, post: 2902342, member: 29746"] Random factors in racial traits (I'm thinking specifically of the "1d10 for Large size" thing here) are generally a bad thing rules-wise, because they're difficult to balance. Some players can get lucky and have the good stuff, while others miss out. I'd recommend splitting the race into two races, one Medium-size and one Large (probably with slightly higher LA). That said, I strongly disagree with WotC's stance that Large size must always mean LA +1 for a race- in my own games I've used homebrew races of Large size for years, and have never found the extra abilities to be unbalancing compared with some other abilities such as, say, built-in attack powers (Maenad and Dromite from the XPH leap to mind) or Flight (which, IMO, is also wildly overestimated in WotC books if it's winged flight with low maneuverability). The only truly powerful ability that Large creatures have, compared with Medium, is their extra reach, and you can easily reduce that to 5 feet with a racial feature if you want to. Without 10 foot reach, Large size is actually more of a disadvantage than an advantage. They get penalties to AC and attack rolls, have more spaces they can be attacked from, and can't fit into spaces as small as their Medium companions can enter. While most Large-size monsters have more HD than Medium creatures, that's not part of the RAW for creature sizes- and even though the Monster Manual creature size change rules mandate increased STR, CON, and natural armor going from Medium to Large there's nothing that forces you to obey them. So the size, in isolation, is not in and of itself worth a Level Adjustment (unless you believe in negative LA I suppose :) ). Keep the above in mind when making your Large-size Bull, and see what you come up with. Maybe it'll even be worth discarding the Medium version altogether- you've already decided to give them a LA of at least +1, so why not jump in with both feet? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Input wanted on home brew race
Top