Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Inquisitive
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mentat55" data-source="post: 4690809" data-attributes="member: 14840"><p>A few thoughts from reading the PDF:</p><p></p><p>1. Why martial melee weapons? It seems the Inquisitive either focuses on alchemical items, crossbows, or gets proficiency in the spiked chain or man-catcher (presumably a superior weapon). Do swords, axes, and hammers really fit the archetype (honest question, I am uncertain)?</p><p></p><p>2. I really like <em>canny positioning</em>.</p><p></p><p>3. For iron shackler, does the inquisitive actually drop the spiked chain? If not, it might be better to say that the inquisitive cannot use the spiked chain to make attacks while the target is restrained (immobilized is redundant with restrained, I think). Also, I would probably stick with the Acrobatics vs. Reflex or Athletics vs. Fortitude mechanic for escaping grabs, for simplicity, and because breaking your inquisitive's spiked chain all the time is probably not cool (DC 15 + 1/2 level is not hard for a level appropriate brute to achieve on a Str check).</p><p></p><p>3. Penetrating Sight -- I wouldn't make this a mark, especially since that is the core mechanic for defenders. Instead, I would call it something else and stick with the mechanics you have there.</p><p></p><p>4. What is the inquisitive's primary attack stat? I saw powers that referenced Intelligence, Dexterity, Strength -- even an Intimidate vs. Will. If you want to go the two different stat options, that might be ok...but frankly I think one attack stat, with two possible secondary stats, is probably the way to go. And the class description at the beginning lists Charisma, Dexterity, and Intelligence, with no mention of Strength.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I think the flavor of the class favors Intelligence or Wisdom as a primary (being smart or perceptive, defeating your foes with your mind rather than brawn). Then keep one of those as a secondary, and add another secondary.</p><p></p><p>5. Either add another class feature (which might be too much), or modify the existing ability of <em>canny positioning</em> or the Inquisitive Techniques to use those secondary ability scores.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mentat55, post: 4690809, member: 14840"] A few thoughts from reading the PDF: 1. Why martial melee weapons? It seems the Inquisitive either focuses on alchemical items, crossbows, or gets proficiency in the spiked chain or man-catcher (presumably a superior weapon). Do swords, axes, and hammers really fit the archetype (honest question, I am uncertain)? 2. I really like [I]canny positioning[/I]. 3. For iron shackler, does the inquisitive actually drop the spiked chain? If not, it might be better to say that the inquisitive cannot use the spiked chain to make attacks while the target is restrained (immobilized is redundant with restrained, I think). Also, I would probably stick with the Acrobatics vs. Reflex or Athletics vs. Fortitude mechanic for escaping grabs, for simplicity, and because breaking your inquisitive's spiked chain all the time is probably not cool (DC 15 + 1/2 level is not hard for a level appropriate brute to achieve on a Str check). 3. Penetrating Sight -- I wouldn't make this a mark, especially since that is the core mechanic for defenders. Instead, I would call it something else and stick with the mechanics you have there. 4. What is the inquisitive's primary attack stat? I saw powers that referenced Intelligence, Dexterity, Strength -- even an Intimidate vs. Will. If you want to go the two different stat options, that might be ok...but frankly I think one attack stat, with two possible secondary stats, is probably the way to go. And the class description at the beginning lists Charisma, Dexterity, and Intelligence, with no mention of Strength. Personally, I think the flavor of the class favors Intelligence or Wisdom as a primary (being smart or perceptive, defeating your foes with your mind rather than brawn). Then keep one of those as a secondary, and add another secondary. 5. Either add another class feature (which might be too much), or modify the existing ability of [I]canny positioning[/I] or the Inquisitive Techniques to use those secondary ability scores. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Inquisitive
Top