Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Insights on a Warrior Antagonist creation using the books
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MostlyDm" data-source="post: 6778364" data-attributes="member: 6788973"><p>Okay, but my point was that you may have been misinterpreting the Archmage's expected damage output. I've got my books now, and for fun I just (over)analyzed the Archmage. I think I see the problem. </p><p></p><p>Your assumption is that the Cone of Cold hits only 2 targets. But why? In the example of an AoE attack, the DMG does suggest assuming it hit 2 targets... but that's for the young white dragon breath weapon, which is a 30 foot cone. Cone of cold is double that.</p><p></p><p>And sure enough, if you crunch the numbers on the adult white dragon, with a 60 foot cone breath weapon, it's offensive CR comes in well below the expected 13... if you assume it still only hits 2 people. Change that to just 3 people, and it nails it's expected damage output on the nose at 85. </p><p></p><p>And this <em>still</em> might be a lowball, since the adult white's HP are below expected (closer to CR 10), so arguably it's got a higher offensive CR than defensive. Maybe it assumes 4 targets, which would put it's offensive CR at 16, averaging the two out to the expected 13. Or perhaps it makes up the difference in legendary actions, which add a bit of gravy damage and resistances.</p><p></p><p>Back to the archmage, though... If we just assume 3 successful targets for each cone of cold, he doesn't even need to cast it into his teleport slot or anything. That dishes out a solid 108 damage, putting his offensive CR up to 17. </p><p></p><p>Follow that with an objective review of his defensive CR... it turns out, I don't think we even need to worry about time stop, except as a way for him to reliably start the fight with his buffs up. He's got 99 HP, but he has resistance to both spell damage <em>and</em> nonmagic weapons. I'm going to say this gives him an HP multiplier of 1.5 instead of the 1.25 normally given to a CR 12 monster with resistance, since the two actually dovetail extremely well. That puts his effective HP at 148, which is still a measly defensive CR of 6. But wait! His AC is 15, and the magic resistance also gives effective AC +2 according to the DMG. His effective AC 17 (compared to the CR 6 base of 15) means we increase his defensive CR by 1, to CR 7.</p><p></p><p>So. Offensive CR 17. Defensive CR 7. Those average out to... drumroll please... CR 12!</p><p></p><p>Looks right to me. You just need to play around with some of the assumptions being made about the monster. Not all AoEs can assume 2 targets when they all have wildly different areas. I would be pretty disappointed in myself if my BBEG could only tag 2 people in a massive AoE like cone of cold. </p><p></p><p>But it's not explicitly stated anywhere... the area of effect section for adjudicating TotM assumes PvE, with potentially large numbers of foes. They don't have an AoE adjudication table for monsters, which is a shame, because it means we have to rely on gut checks, common sense, and outright guesswork.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, hope that clears up where I was coming from. The Archmage fits in okay with the CR system after all, in my book. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MostlyDm, post: 6778364, member: 6788973"] Okay, but my point was that you may have been misinterpreting the Archmage's expected damage output. I've got my books now, and for fun I just (over)analyzed the Archmage. I think I see the problem. Your assumption is that the Cone of Cold hits only 2 targets. But why? In the example of an AoE attack, the DMG does suggest assuming it hit 2 targets... but that's for the young white dragon breath weapon, which is a 30 foot cone. Cone of cold is double that. And sure enough, if you crunch the numbers on the adult white dragon, with a 60 foot cone breath weapon, it's offensive CR comes in well below the expected 13... if you assume it still only hits 2 people. Change that to just 3 people, and it nails it's expected damage output on the nose at 85. And this [i]still[/i] might be a lowball, since the adult white's HP are below expected (closer to CR 10), so arguably it's got a higher offensive CR than defensive. Maybe it assumes 4 targets, which would put it's offensive CR at 16, averaging the two out to the expected 13. Or perhaps it makes up the difference in legendary actions, which add a bit of gravy damage and resistances. Back to the archmage, though... If we just assume 3 successful targets for each cone of cold, he doesn't even need to cast it into his teleport slot or anything. That dishes out a solid 108 damage, putting his offensive CR up to 17. Follow that with an objective review of his defensive CR... it turns out, I don't think we even need to worry about time stop, except as a way for him to reliably start the fight with his buffs up. He's got 99 HP, but he has resistance to both spell damage [i]and[/i] nonmagic weapons. I'm going to say this gives him an HP multiplier of 1.5 instead of the 1.25 normally given to a CR 12 monster with resistance, since the two actually dovetail extremely well. That puts his effective HP at 148, which is still a measly defensive CR of 6. But wait! His AC is 15, and the magic resistance also gives effective AC +2 according to the DMG. His effective AC 17 (compared to the CR 6 base of 15) means we increase his defensive CR by 1, to CR 7. So. Offensive CR 17. Defensive CR 7. Those average out to... drumroll please... CR 12! Looks right to me. You just need to play around with some of the assumptions being made about the monster. Not all AoEs can assume 2 targets when they all have wildly different areas. I would be pretty disappointed in myself if my BBEG could only tag 2 people in a massive AoE like cone of cold. But it's not explicitly stated anywhere... the area of effect section for adjudicating TotM assumes PvE, with potentially large numbers of foes. They don't have an AoE adjudication table for monsters, which is a shame, because it means we have to rely on gut checks, common sense, and outright guesswork. Anyway, hope that clears up where I was coming from. The Archmage fits in okay with the CR system after all, in my book. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Insights on a Warrior Antagonist creation using the books
Top