Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="moritheil" data-source="post: 4177845" data-attributes="member: 30610">To be fair, Slaved, I have yet to see you accept any evidence that is directly contrary to any position you support in any thread - regardless of the number or caliber of posters that offer said evidence (including Hyp.)  I'm going to try to point something out, so please don't take it personally.I'm not saying you don't have a point with this particular argument here, just that it helps to acknowledge your own bias if you want other people to acknowledge your arguments.  There are people you argued to a standstill in other threads that are going to be hesitant to accept that Artoomis hasn't provided quality evidence just because you say it isn't up to your standards.This sort of harsh, abbreviated dismissal is also a classic example of how people frustrate interlocutors on a BBS:It espouses no position and does not offer direct counterevidence - i.e. "This is what the rules say (quote) and this is what you said (quote), and this is the difference; therefore what you said is not what the rules say."  It's not a good way to continue dialogue.I don't mean to come down on you in particular, but I don't have private messaging capabilities and this is the third or fourth time I have seen a post that looks like this:Again, I'm not saying you ought to agree with him, just that it seems that this sort of thing can be avoided if you're more expressive of what you believe the rules are saying.  This goes for everyone who abbreviates their posts in rules discussions.</blockquote>

Verification