Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Inspiring leader feat questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6745323" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>My problem is that the feat text does not say you can use it outside the indicated parameters. A DM would be quite understandable if he read the feat to mean you could inspire up to six people and that this takes ten minutes full stop.</p><p></p><p>(Not that the feat also allows you to inspire twelve people in twenty minutes, eighteen people in thirty, and so on.)</p><p></p><p>Since this latter interpretation seems to have overall support from the forums, meaning none of you have indicated you run the feat the former way, I have provided my preferred phrasing. </p><p></p><p>A feat that specifically states "N people per X minutes" makes it much more clear that the numerals mentioned aren't some kind of hard limit. The text then explicitly allows for a continuance beyond X minutes. This I prefer.</p><p></p><p>Zapp</p><p></p><p>PS. If the feat was a spell, the original phrasing would have been much more appropriate. Then it would be obvious that each casting of the spell would do what the text says it does.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6745323, member: 12731"] My problem is that the feat text does not say you can use it outside the indicated parameters. A DM would be quite understandable if he read the feat to mean you could inspire up to six people and that this takes ten minutes full stop. (Not that the feat also allows you to inspire twelve people in twenty minutes, eighteen people in thirty, and so on.) Since this latter interpretation seems to have overall support from the forums, meaning none of you have indicated you run the feat the former way, I have provided my preferred phrasing. A feat that specifically states "N people per X minutes" makes it much more clear that the numerals mentioned aren't some kind of hard limit. The text then explicitly allows for a continuance beyond X minutes. This I prefer. Zapp PS. If the feat was a spell, the original phrasing would have been much more appropriate. Then it would be obvious that each casting of the spell would do what the text says it does. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Inspiring leader feat questions
Top