Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Plaguedguy" data-source="post: 5336411" data-attributes="member: 76126">I'm pretty sure I in no way said that 4th edition is somehow bad or neglectful of roleplay or DM support. Seeing as I wholeheartedly embraced it and have been DMing it since release that might be a bit of a contradictory position on my part.To clarify, I was jokingly referring to the attitude some players have expressed that every power and rule in 4e must be clarified completely lest we somehow risk balance or abuse. Hence the little angel smiley, which I apparently wrongly assumed would infer humour.Edit: Which is in fact somewhat the point of discussion no? That this power as it is written is supposedly 'too open ended' for 4e, to which I think I've made a pretty solid argument against no more than a couple posts above.</blockquote>