Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Instant Friends
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5338401" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>I think you are missing my point a bit. It's one that has been true for skill challenges from the beginning - they can't be something that one single check could solve on its own. </p><p> </p><p>If you are in a skill challenge to persuade a leader to help you, there has to be a reason the skill challenge does not already end after the first successful diplomacy check. If all you need to do to succeed at the skill challenge is befriend the leader, there is already an issue with the skill challenge. </p><p> </p><p>Negotiating with a leader in the DMG is not just trying to make him your friend, it is trying to get tangible assistance from him - in the form of treasure or equivalent aid. (Something that this power specifically can't do.) The skill challenge requires not just befriending the leader (Diplomacy), but also persuading him that helping the PCs is in his best interests (Insight, History). </p><p> </p><p>The fact you can spend a power to freely succeed at one aspect of the challenge doesn't mean the entire challenge is over. </p><p> </p><p>This situation already exists elsewhere. The party gets to a raging river that they need to cross, which the DM has designed as a skill challenge. Turns out the Wizard can cast Fly - thus bypassing the Athletics check to swim through the river. How does the DM respond?</p><p> </p><p>One option is to note that Fly just lets the Wizard succeed, and doesn't help his friends. One free success for the Wizard - everyone else still needs to swim. You could apply the same here - the leader likes the Wizard. But he still doesn't trust his comrades. "How well do you really know them? Are you sure they have our best interests at heart?" More convincing needs to be done to gain his assistance.</p><p> </p><p>Another option is that the DM improvises some new obstacles. Fly provides a free success or two, but the Wizard might need to make some other check to avoid drawing notice from enemies while flying, or may have to deal with weather that makes flying difficult. Or as they fly overhead, they notice someone drowning in the river, and need to swim after them to get them. With Instant Friends, they still need to help justify the leader giving them what they want - perhaps not just with him, but with his seneschal. Perhaps they need to find a way to convince his bodyguards that he hasn't been magically influenced. Etc. </p><p> </p><p>Finally, you might let the spell bypass the encounter, but introduce a different skill challenge later. Maybe the use of magic attracted the attention of wild native spirits, and they later need to fend them off. Similarly, when Instant Friends wears off, they have to deal with the fallout - maybe the leader loses influence because of his bad judgement with the PCs. Maybe rumors spread that they enchant others to do their bidding. Either one, some other issue arises because of this that they have to deal with. </p><p> </p><p>In the end, sure, not every DM will come up with answers like these. But this isn't anything new. What happens if you have a wilderness skill challenge and the party teleports to their destination? Or flies over your obstacle? Or decides to just blow up your cleverly locked door? Rituals and powers have always been able to introduce the need for a DM to think on the spot with Skill Challenges, and this one power doesn't change that. </p><p> </p><p>In the end, I still haven't seen any <em>actual</em> situations described in which this spell would be abusive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5338401, member: 61155"] I think you are missing my point a bit. It's one that has been true for skill challenges from the beginning - they can't be something that one single check could solve on its own. If you are in a skill challenge to persuade a leader to help you, there has to be a reason the skill challenge does not already end after the first successful diplomacy check. If all you need to do to succeed at the skill challenge is befriend the leader, there is already an issue with the skill challenge. Negotiating with a leader in the DMG is not just trying to make him your friend, it is trying to get tangible assistance from him - in the form of treasure or equivalent aid. (Something that this power specifically can't do.) The skill challenge requires not just befriending the leader (Diplomacy), but also persuading him that helping the PCs is in his best interests (Insight, History). The fact you can spend a power to freely succeed at one aspect of the challenge doesn't mean the entire challenge is over. This situation already exists elsewhere. The party gets to a raging river that they need to cross, which the DM has designed as a skill challenge. Turns out the Wizard can cast Fly - thus bypassing the Athletics check to swim through the river. How does the DM respond? One option is to note that Fly just lets the Wizard succeed, and doesn't help his friends. One free success for the Wizard - everyone else still needs to swim. You could apply the same here - the leader likes the Wizard. But he still doesn't trust his comrades. "How well do you really know them? Are you sure they have our best interests at heart?" More convincing needs to be done to gain his assistance. Another option is that the DM improvises some new obstacles. Fly provides a free success or two, but the Wizard might need to make some other check to avoid drawing notice from enemies while flying, or may have to deal with weather that makes flying difficult. Or as they fly overhead, they notice someone drowning in the river, and need to swim after them to get them. With Instant Friends, they still need to help justify the leader giving them what they want - perhaps not just with him, but with his seneschal. Perhaps they need to find a way to convince his bodyguards that he hasn't been magically influenced. Etc. Finally, you might let the spell bypass the encounter, but introduce a different skill challenge later. Maybe the use of magic attracted the attention of wild native spirits, and they later need to fend them off. Similarly, when Instant Friends wears off, they have to deal with the fallout - maybe the leader loses influence because of his bad judgement with the PCs. Maybe rumors spread that they enchant others to do their bidding. Either one, some other issue arises because of this that they have to deal with. In the end, sure, not every DM will come up with answers like these. But this isn't anything new. What happens if you have a wilderness skill challenge and the party teleports to their destination? Or flies over your obstacle? Or decides to just blow up your cleverly locked door? Rituals and powers have always been able to introduce the need for a DM to think on the spot with Skill Challenges, and this one power doesn't change that. In the end, I still haven't seen any [I]actual[/I] situations described in which this spell would be abusive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Instant Friends
Top