Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Intellectual challenge] Justify a paladin being a member of a thieves' guild
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 3680716" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>Absolutely right. However, a paladin is required to fight even illegitimate authority <strong>with honor</strong>. Hiding out in the forest and taking people's worldly possessions are not honorable, however noble they may be. Such behavior is dark and seedy and malicious, even if it is entirely just, and a paladin cannot do such actions, nor can he tolerate the company of those who do them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>While definitely Good, I really don't think it's honorable. Let's do a little dictionary-digging...</p><p></p><p>Honor implies a good public esteem, a high social standing, a purity, an integrity, an honesty.</p><p></p><p>Honor doesn't tell you what to do, it tells you how to do it: with a proud face, and an unwillingness to compromise.</p><p></p><p>An honorable person can fight, but only as a last resort, and then only to protect, as a preventative measure. To attack willfully is rather dishonorable, because it's not operating with purity and integrity, but rather with hostility. This is especially true if a threat of violence is not an honest threat, but an attempt to get something else out of them, or if the threat of violence is motivated by gain.</p><p></p><p>Robin Hood had a Good agenda, but it wasn't honorable -- they used terrorism and guerrilla tactics to force evil to come to terms with them. They stole for vengeance, for retribution, and their violent threats were often simply to get such vengeance.</p><p></p><p>While entirely Good, none of this seems honorable. It's below the belt, below the board, it doesn't display integrity, it makes you an outcast, and it means your words are not always worth what you say they are (a serious blow to any bastion of honesty and forthrightness like a paladin).</p><p></p><p>Admittedly, "honor" is probably open to individual DM interpretation. But it seems to me that the implication is that a paladin is NOT a good fit for a Robin Hood or Batman type figure, because the methods that these guys use to restore order, while Lawful Good, aren't honorable and forthright. Vigilantism, terrorism, and exploitive tactics are, I think, very much against the paladin's code.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my reading, a Paladin is forbidden to "wheedle" anyone into attacking them, or of challenging them on false pretexts, or of pretending to take insult where no insult was really taken. This is the core of honorable behavior: dealing with honesty and integrity in everything. You have no ulterior motives. You state your intent plainly and clearly. That is your courage: you don't fear the reactions of others.</p><p></p><p>A Paladin would have a lot of trouble maintaining their status, IMC, convincing someone to get in a fight for the intent of defeating them and making off with their loot. This is greed of the highest caliber, and abuse of power to boot. The forces of Good don't need you to steal for them. The forces of Good need you to directly STOP EVIL, not just create mischief for it. In fact, you are forbidden from simple mischief-making: you are allowed only the direct approach, and you are beholden to it. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Possibly, but then it's not really a Thieves' Guild, it's now a tax collection agency, and it operates entirely above the board, so it's not really relevant to the OP's request.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 3680716, member: 2067"] Absolutely right. However, a paladin is required to fight even illegitimate authority [B]with honor[/B]. Hiding out in the forest and taking people's worldly possessions are not honorable, however noble they may be. Such behavior is dark and seedy and malicious, even if it is entirely just, and a paladin cannot do such actions, nor can he tolerate the company of those who do them. While definitely Good, I really don't think it's honorable. Let's do a little dictionary-digging... Honor implies a good public esteem, a high social standing, a purity, an integrity, an honesty. Honor doesn't tell you what to do, it tells you how to do it: with a proud face, and an unwillingness to compromise. An honorable person can fight, but only as a last resort, and then only to protect, as a preventative measure. To attack willfully is rather dishonorable, because it's not operating with purity and integrity, but rather with hostility. This is especially true if a threat of violence is not an honest threat, but an attempt to get something else out of them, or if the threat of violence is motivated by gain. Robin Hood had a Good agenda, but it wasn't honorable -- they used terrorism and guerrilla tactics to force evil to come to terms with them. They stole for vengeance, for retribution, and their violent threats were often simply to get such vengeance. While entirely Good, none of this seems honorable. It's below the belt, below the board, it doesn't display integrity, it makes you an outcast, and it means your words are not always worth what you say they are (a serious blow to any bastion of honesty and forthrightness like a paladin). Admittedly, "honor" is probably open to individual DM interpretation. But it seems to me that the implication is that a paladin is NOT a good fit for a Robin Hood or Batman type figure, because the methods that these guys use to restore order, while Lawful Good, aren't honorable and forthright. Vigilantism, terrorism, and exploitive tactics are, I think, very much against the paladin's code. In my reading, a Paladin is forbidden to "wheedle" anyone into attacking them, or of challenging them on false pretexts, or of pretending to take insult where no insult was really taken. This is the core of honorable behavior: dealing with honesty and integrity in everything. You have no ulterior motives. You state your intent plainly and clearly. That is your courage: you don't fear the reactions of others. A Paladin would have a lot of trouble maintaining their status, IMC, convincing someone to get in a fight for the intent of defeating them and making off with their loot. This is greed of the highest caliber, and abuse of power to boot. The forces of Good don't need you to steal for them. The forces of Good need you to directly STOP EVIL, not just create mischief for it. In fact, you are forbidden from simple mischief-making: you are allowed only the direct approach, and you are beholden to it. Possibly, but then it's not really a Thieves' Guild, it's now a tax collection agency, and it operates entirely above the board, so it's not really relevant to the OP's request. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Intellectual challenge] Justify a paladin being a member of a thieves' guild
Top