Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Intelligent Items And Body Control
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kaodi" data-source="post: 5957761" data-attributes="member: 1231"><p>This came up in a thread I started in the Pathfinder forum, but I think it is appropriate here because the mechanic, of course, is straight from D&D. </p><p></p><p>Why is it that all intelligent items seem to have this ability to control their users at least around once every twenty days? Does this not take much of the fun out of intelligent items, and especially intelligent items that disagree with their wielders? </p><p></p><p>Certainly there is call for some magic items being able to take over their wielders in this way. That should probably be a specific ability though, and not a one size fits all add on to the rules. After all, intelligent items are often flavoured as not being merely artificial intelligence, but as being containers or prisons for powerful beings. And if that powerful being could dominate people when it is free, such as dragons, demons, powerful wizards, and such, there would certainly be justification for it being able to keep doing that. But otherwise, nuh-uh. I mean, how would you justify Lumiere being able to control Belle like a puppet just because he was turned into a candlestick?</p><p></p><p>A different strategy I was thinking of for putting control back in the hands of players, while still keeping intelligent items as devious, manipulative force, would be to just apply penalties for actions that go against the wishes of the item. So, as an example: if you are wielding a powerful elf-slaying weapon, and you go into battle against a party of drow and their spider companions, you might get a penalty on attacks made against any opponent who is not an elf until all the elves are dead. So you, as the player, do not have control of your characters actions taken out of your hands, but rather face a substantially worse chance of success when you do not go along with an items wishes.</p><p></p><p>In any case, as intelligent items are often in control of their own abilities, it seems like there is plenty of reason to treat them well, as you would any NPC who you wished to gain the aid of, rather than just giving them control of your character every time you rolled poorly on your Will save.</p><p></p><p>In addition to these points, while I imagine the intelligent item rules were inspired by Elric's sword, perhaps people more widely read in this area than I could go into some of the important historical stuff on intelligent items.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kaodi, post: 5957761, member: 1231"] This came up in a thread I started in the Pathfinder forum, but I think it is appropriate here because the mechanic, of course, is straight from D&D. Why is it that all intelligent items seem to have this ability to control their users at least around once every twenty days? Does this not take much of the fun out of intelligent items, and especially intelligent items that disagree with their wielders? Certainly there is call for some magic items being able to take over their wielders in this way. That should probably be a specific ability though, and not a one size fits all add on to the rules. After all, intelligent items are often flavoured as not being merely artificial intelligence, but as being containers or prisons for powerful beings. And if that powerful being could dominate people when it is free, such as dragons, demons, powerful wizards, and such, there would certainly be justification for it being able to keep doing that. But otherwise, nuh-uh. I mean, how would you justify Lumiere being able to control Belle like a puppet just because he was turned into a candlestick? A different strategy I was thinking of for putting control back in the hands of players, while still keeping intelligent items as devious, manipulative force, would be to just apply penalties for actions that go against the wishes of the item. So, as an example: if you are wielding a powerful elf-slaying weapon, and you go into battle against a party of drow and their spider companions, you might get a penalty on attacks made against any opponent who is not an elf until all the elves are dead. So you, as the player, do not have control of your characters actions taken out of your hands, but rather face a substantially worse chance of success when you do not go along with an items wishes. In any case, as intelligent items are often in control of their own abilities, it seems like there is plenty of reason to treat them well, as you would any NPC who you wished to gain the aid of, rather than just giving them control of your character every time you rolled poorly on your Will save. In addition to these points, while I imagine the intelligent item rules were inspired by Elric's sword, perhaps people more widely read in this area than I could go into some of the important historical stuff on intelligent items. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Intelligent Items And Body Control
Top