Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intelligent Weapons Vs. DR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="prospero63" data-source="post: 4600094" data-attributes="member: 16014"><p>I don't think you are correct here. You have made some leaps of logic that aren't justified, which is resulting in flawed conclusion. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is the first part of your logic flaw. First, alignment and alignment subtype are not the same. They aren't even directly related in fact. For example, a creature can be lawful good with the [Evil] subtype. So you can't interchange their use at will. Second, you took the quote out of context. What it actually says is:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So it's not because of alignment that the ability to bypass DR occurs. It's due to the fact that the appropriate subtype applies. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No they can't. Alignment and an alignment subtype are not the same thing. An intelligent weapon would need to have the appropriate alignment subtype in order to bypass DR. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Correct, but this fact bears no relevance on alignment subtypes. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This makes it pretty clear that alignment and alignment subtypes are wholly independent of each other. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure what your point here was...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, this is where you are executing a logic flaw. You are stating that the sword has an alignment, then jumping to the conclusion that since it has an alignment it is suddenly the subtype [Evil]. That's simply not correct. The correct last sentence is actually:</p><p></p><p>Per the description of DR, a weapon that has an alignment subtype can overcome the appropriate DR X/alignment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="prospero63, post: 4600094, member: 16014"] I don't think you are correct here. You have made some leaps of logic that aren't justified, which is resulting in flawed conclusion. This is the first part of your logic flaw. First, alignment and alignment subtype are not the same. They aren't even directly related in fact. For example, a creature can be lawful good with the [Evil] subtype. So you can't interchange their use at will. Second, you took the quote out of context. What it actually says is: So it's not because of alignment that the ability to bypass DR occurs. It's due to the fact that the appropriate subtype applies. No they can't. Alignment and an alignment subtype are not the same thing. An intelligent weapon would need to have the appropriate alignment subtype in order to bypass DR. Correct, but this fact bears no relevance on alignment subtypes. This makes it pretty clear that alignment and alignment subtypes are wholly independent of each other. Not sure what your point here was... Again, this is where you are executing a logic flaw. You are stating that the sword has an alignment, then jumping to the conclusion that since it has an alignment it is suddenly the subtype [Evil]. That's simply not correct. The correct last sentence is actually: Per the description of DR, a weapon that has an alignment subtype can overcome the appropriate DR X/alignment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intelligent Weapons Vs. DR
Top