Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intensified Epic Staffs (something is wrong)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anders" data-source="post: 418914" data-attributes="member: 819"><p>There are either some major <strong>error</strong> in the Intesify Spell description or in the description of some Epic Staffs.</p><p></p><p>According to third paragraph on page 61 in ELH under Intensify Spell: "Saving throws...are not affected." Which effectively means that this feat does not affect the spell save DC.</p><p></p><p>But when flipping over to page 142 in ELH and scanning forward, there are many staffs with intensified spells (such as <em>staff of cosmos</em> and <em>staff of winter</em>) with HUGE spell save DCs.</p><p></p><p>Take a look at the <em>staff of cosmos</em>. Its intensified <em>chain lightning</em> has a spell save DC of 29(!). According to the Intensify Spell feat, this DC should have been 19, not 29.</p><p></p><p>Staff DC = 10 + 1.5 * spell level.</p><p></p><p>Normally the mentioned spell's DC in any kind of staff is DC 19 (= 10 + 1.5 * 6), <em>but</em> the staff on page 142 has DC 29 (= 10 +1.5 * 13).</p><p></p><p>All this implies that the staffs on page 142 in the ELH with intensified spells have an effective +7 spell level (as they would <strong>if</strong> the mentioned feat did affect spell save DCs).</p><p></p><p>So which way is it?</p><p></p><p>Does the feat raise the effective spell level with +7 levels (as it does according to the mentioned staffs), or doesn't it (as it shouldn't according the feat description).</p><p></p><p>Clearly, the authors didn't communicate much on this matter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anders, post: 418914, member: 819"] There are either some major [b]error[/b] in the Intesify Spell description or in the description of some Epic Staffs. According to third paragraph on page 61 in ELH under Intensify Spell: "Saving throws...are not affected." Which effectively means that this feat does not affect the spell save DC. But when flipping over to page 142 in ELH and scanning forward, there are many staffs with intensified spells (such as [i]staff of cosmos[/i] and [i]staff of winter[/i]) with HUGE spell save DCs. Take a look at the [i]staff of cosmos[/i]. Its intensified [i]chain lightning[/i] has a spell save DC of 29(!). According to the Intensify Spell feat, this DC should have been 19, not 29. Staff DC = 10 + 1.5 * spell level. Normally the mentioned spell's DC in any kind of staff is DC 19 (= 10 + 1.5 * 6), [i]but[/i] the staff on page 142 has DC 29 (= 10 +1.5 * 13). All this implies that the staffs on page 142 in the ELH with intensified spells have an effective +7 spell level (as they would [b]if[/b] the mentioned feat did affect spell save DCs). So which way is it? Does the feat raise the effective spell level with +7 levels (as it does according to the mentioned staffs), or doesn't it (as it shouldn't according the feat description). Clearly, the authors didn't communicate much on this matter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intensified Epic Staffs (something is wrong)
Top