Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intensify Spell is an Epic WASTE!!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HEL Pit Fiend" data-source="post: 274313" data-attributes="member: 5971"><p>Exactly!!! Just because the ride-by-attack feat DOESN'T say that you can ride your mount backwards while making an attack, doesn't mean you CAN. Like you said it comes down to common sense.</p><p></p><p>Most people reading the rules for the first time on applying multiple metas on spells would tend to believe that the authors are talking about applying different metas to the same spell. Afterall, all the examples are demonstrating different metas, not the same one over and over.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, in our extended group, we have 3 mid to high level wizards who have chosen their feats (or more precisely, have not needed to choose certain feats) based solely on the ablility to stack Empower Spell on itself. Too many people now depend on the stackablilty of Empower because their whole feat selecton strategy for the last 15 or so levels is based on that ability.</p><p></p><p>Btw, stacking empower never bothered me untill the ELH came out. I said "ohh cool, maybe there will be a some new damage increasing metamagic feats in there that can be useful." Ya right. I guess if you want a little "flavor" and want to take the "Epic" Enhance Spell or "Epic" Intensify Spell feats, knock yourself out, but the "stacking" non-epic Empower Spell does AT LEAST the same, if not better.</p><p></p><p>When in doubt: Empower!!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HEL Pit Fiend, post: 274313, member: 5971"] Exactly!!! Just because the ride-by-attack feat DOESN'T say that you can ride your mount backwards while making an attack, doesn't mean you CAN. Like you said it comes down to common sense. Most people reading the rules for the first time on applying multiple metas on spells would tend to believe that the authors are talking about applying different metas to the same spell. Afterall, all the examples are demonstrating different metas, not the same one over and over. Unfortunately, in our extended group, we have 3 mid to high level wizards who have chosen their feats (or more precisely, have not needed to choose certain feats) based solely on the ablility to stack Empower Spell on itself. Too many people now depend on the stackablilty of Empower because their whole feat selecton strategy for the last 15 or so levels is based on that ability. Btw, stacking empower never bothered me untill the ELH came out. I said "ohh cool, maybe there will be a some new damage increasing metamagic feats in there that can be useful." Ya right. I guess if you want a little "flavor" and want to take the "Epic" Enhance Spell or "Epic" Intensify Spell feats, knock yourself out, but the "stacking" non-epic Empower Spell does AT LEAST the same, if not better. When in doubt: Empower!!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intensify Spell is an Epic WASTE!!!!
Top