Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aries_Omega" data-source="post: 1605824" data-attributes="member: 15693">Non-Human BigotsI have actually explored the idea of other races being the aggressor. In my world the high elves with their empire explored the land and came across other elves that were brown and primative. These "wild elves" were given the great gift of "culture". Some resented it and others fought it. Finally the high elves decided to let them be and quite ruling them as a colonial power. Thats when the humans came and did the same damn thing! So the wild elves talked to the high elves and told them what was going on. The high elves felt that no one else should be messing with their painted and tattooed primitive cousins except them and went to war over it. Later Orcs were able to put aside their differences and unite....causing the other races to set aside their squabbles and take them on.Also dwarves....despite that they ar lawful, in my campaign the do not get along. Each dwarven settlement is a city state. Two city states could have the same subrace of dwarf and still not get along. The are bigoted towards each other. Does this make sense to anyone else. Lawful dwarves don't get along yet Chaotic high elves have a large empire?The only race that doesn't do this in my campaign setting is halflings and gnomes. Rock Gnomes and Svirfneblin get along for example. Those races just seem to be able to blend into whatever place they are at and not be bothered too much.Aries</blockquote>

Verification