Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Akrasia" data-source="post: 2403194" data-attributes="member: 23012">Fair enough.  I should have qualified my original comment.But it is clear that the goal of the OGL was to drive most non-D&D games out of the market.  This goal assumes that D&D (or d20 more generally) could accommodate the interests of the vast majority of gamers.My point was that many companies have moved *away* from d20 (and many d20 companies have gone out of business).  *More* non-d20 games are being published these days.  Hence the strategy of marginalizing non-d20 games does not appear to have been successful.  (Although I suppose that one could claim that the publication of these games is compatible with support for them being at "the lowest possible level" -- but I doubt that.)</blockquote>