Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Akrasia" data-source="post: 2403481" data-attributes="member: 23012">More than a few years ago.We have a new version of WFRP out now, that appears to be doing quite well by all reports.&nbsp; GURPS 4e also appears to be doing quite well.&nbsp; According to Nephew, Ars Magica 5e is thriving.&nbsp; And now Mongoose is planning to publish a new version of Runequest (the main rival to D&amp;D back in the day).I'm no &quot;industry insider&quot;, but the range of non-d20 options seems much healthier now than merely two years ago.(And hey, I've got nothing against the OGL.&nbsp; I like both True20 and C&amp;C -- both games made possible by the OGL.)You might be right.&nbsp; I interpreted the following quote somewhat differently:I guess I would think that the &quot;lowest level possible&quot; would be lower than what is available now.&nbsp; But that's just my interpretation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Akrasia, post: 2403481, member: 23012"] More than a few years ago. We have a new version of WFRP out now, that appears to be doing quite well by all reports. GURPS 4e also appears to be doing quite well. According to Nephew, Ars Magica 5e is thriving. And now Mongoose is planning to publish a new version of Runequest (the main rival to D&D back in the day). I'm no "industry insider", but the range of non-d20 options seems much healthier now than merely two years ago. (And hey, I've got nothing against the OGL. I like both True20 and C&C -- both games made possible by the OGL.) You might be right. I interpreted the following quote somewhat differently: I guess I would think that the "lowest level possible" would be lower than what is available now. But that's just my interpretation. [/QUOTE]

Verification