Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 7496382" data-attributes="member: 71699">I think if you look at what designers wrote about previous editions, there was as much awareness in the past that rules couldn't cover every situation, as there is now.What counts as 5th edition D&D, far less so <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />The rule says damage is needed to sustain rage more than six seconds: I think removing that requirement isn't adding a bullet point. Obviously people slice this different ways so let's assume we can't agree. What continues to puzzle me is why, if its rulings over rules, one needs to argue that its not an alteration?</blockquote>