Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Interpreting Empathic Link
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="clark411" data-source="post: 386854" data-attributes="member: 4768"><p>Firstly, I'm unsure if this is best for DnD Rules or House Rules, as it has to do both with well... Rules interpretations, and it also has to do with alternate ways to use the mechanic.</p><p></p><p>That said, I've had a discussion with a player regarding the special mount his paladin is about to recieve, and the empathic link that he has with it. I'm less strict with how rules are interpreted and more interested in playing a diverse game that might diverge from the rules in interesting (but not hampering/weakening ways).</p><p></p><p>What I'd like to know is if empathic link can be interpreted as communication through a way that doesn't involve sentences, words, etc. PHB pg 43 states "The paladin cannot see through the mount's eyes, but they can communicate telepathically." Despite popular media uses of telepathy, and Star Trek differences between empathy and telepathy, telepathy proper lists verbal communication as a possibility amongst others- like emotion, sensation/perception, and pure thought.</p><p></p><p>This being the case, I'd argue that an interaction could be something other than a direct dialogue in something the paladin perceives in common and the mount percieves in... horse or whatever you have. The paladin feels pain, the mount's link allows it to percieve it, and it rushes to his side. The paladin wants the mount to do something, the mount senses it and, hopefully, performs the action in the best way its animal mind can do so. The paladin wonders what the horse is up to... and percieves the bite of cold and satisfaction of a strong desire in the horse to drink... ah- it's drinking at the bubbling brook we passed before camping.</p><p></p><p>What are some of the limitations of this alternate interpretation? Is it unreasonable, or restrictive? Have you DMed or played with a similar kind of empathic link to a familiar or mount?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="clark411, post: 386854, member: 4768"] Firstly, I'm unsure if this is best for DnD Rules or House Rules, as it has to do both with well... Rules interpretations, and it also has to do with alternate ways to use the mechanic. That said, I've had a discussion with a player regarding the special mount his paladin is about to recieve, and the empathic link that he has with it. I'm less strict with how rules are interpreted and more interested in playing a diverse game that might diverge from the rules in interesting (but not hampering/weakening ways). What I'd like to know is if empathic link can be interpreted as communication through a way that doesn't involve sentences, words, etc. PHB pg 43 states "The paladin cannot see through the mount's eyes, but they can communicate telepathically." Despite popular media uses of telepathy, and Star Trek differences between empathy and telepathy, telepathy proper lists verbal communication as a possibility amongst others- like emotion, sensation/perception, and pure thought. This being the case, I'd argue that an interaction could be something other than a direct dialogue in something the paladin perceives in common and the mount percieves in... horse or whatever you have. The paladin feels pain, the mount's link allows it to percieve it, and it rushes to his side. The paladin wants the mount to do something, the mount senses it and, hopefully, performs the action in the best way its animal mind can do so. The paladin wonders what the horse is up to... and percieves the bite of cold and satisfaction of a strong desire in the horse to drink... ah- it's drinking at the bubbling brook we passed before camping. What are some of the limitations of this alternate interpretation? Is it unreasonable, or restrictive? Have you DMed or played with a similar kind of empathic link to a familiar or mount? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Interpreting Empathic Link
Top