Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ScotMartin" data-source="post: 3485054" data-attributes="member: 5110">Thanks to those who've said nice things about my previous post with the list of ideas.&nbsp; I appreciate it.&nbsp; However, I definitely left something important out that a couple of other users have brought up since... feedback/collaboration from the user community.&nbsp; When it comes to the rules and stats of this game, there is no better editor for an article or adventure than the on-line community.&nbsp; As evidence of this, I present this excellent review of Expedition to Castle Ravenloft posted by John Cooper (scroll a quarter of the way in to see his bullet point list of stat block errors):<a href="http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&amp;reviewid=3221768" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&amp;reviewid=3221768</a>Obviously, I'd love everything to be accurate when first put up, but that's not realistic.&nbsp; And, as others have said, a huge advantage of on-line content over print is the ability to correct and update the content later on.&nbsp; There needs to be a way for users to leave this kind of feedback, and there has to be someone in WotC who will read it, double-check it and then act upon it.&nbsp; -Scot</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ScotMartin, post: 3485054, member: 5110"] Thanks to those who've said nice things about my previous post with the list of ideas. I appreciate it. However, I definitely left something important out that a couple of other users have brought up since... feedback/collaboration from the user community. When it comes to the rules and stats of this game, there is no better editor for an article or adventure than the on-line community. As evidence of this, I present this excellent review of Expedition to Castle Ravenloft posted by John Cooper (scroll a quarter of the way in to see his bullet point list of stat block errors): [url]http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&reviewid=3221768[/url] Obviously, I'd love everything to be accurate when first put up, but that's not realistic. And, as others have said, a huge advantage of on-line content over print is the ability to correct and update the content later on. There needs to be a way for users to leave this kind of feedback, and there has to be someone in WotC who will read it, double-check it and then act upon it. -Scot [/QUOTE]

Verification