Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Interview with Scott Rouse, Chris Perkins & Bill Slavicsek
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deadDMwalking" data-source="post: 3507011" data-attributes="member: 51708"><p>To be upset, or even ticked off, does not imply that the reaction has not been reasoned.</p><p></p><p>After hearing the news, my initial reaction was to be upset. But then I thought about it. I read everything that had been posted on the subject officially. I sent letters to WotC and Hasbro, and received a reply back.</p><p></p><p>Now, when I am upset, it is the end result as a rational and reasonable person. Reasonable people have emotions. It would be unreasonable to assume they don't. The magazines are important to the hobby on an emotional and physical level.</p><p></p><p>As for myself, yes, I have decided that electronic content is, for me, inferior. There are electronic versions of various books that I've been given for free. I don't use them. I buy the book if I want the material. I open the book if I want to read the material.</p><p></p><p>As for NDAs, I'm quite familiar with them. </p><p>The following link describes them in some detail, and was the quickest thing I could link to after a Google search.</p><p></p><p>Now, the NDA should be used to avoid releasing proprietary information. The most important reason is to avoid creating undue competition. The thing about the NDA is that it prevents talking about some things and not others. Now, those under the NDA could avoid talking about anything that isn't specifically detailed to avoid 'giving hints' about what is covered, but the 'cat is out of the bag'. They're willing to say there is a DI, that the content will be electronic, that many of the features are not firmly decided, etc. There is quite a bit of information. </p><p></p><p>It is even possible that the NDA specifically prohibits explaining why an online only model is considered superior by WotC. Still, I don't believe that is the case. They have not said anything that DIRECTLY supports that statement. Some people may want to give the company the benefit of the doubt - I don't. It isn't because I'm never wrong. It's because the company has already lost my trust before this issue in other ways.</p><p></p><p>I proudly subscribe to both magazines. I know that puts me into a 'minority' category of gamers. WotC has told me that my 'minority' doesn't matter to them. While that may not have been their intended message, that's what I keep hearing.</p><p></p><p>So, I'm upset. But not without reason.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deadDMwalking, post: 3507011, member: 51708"] To be upset, or even ticked off, does not imply that the reaction has not been reasoned. After hearing the news, my initial reaction was to be upset. But then I thought about it. I read everything that had been posted on the subject officially. I sent letters to WotC and Hasbro, and received a reply back. Now, when I am upset, it is the end result as a rational and reasonable person. Reasonable people have emotions. It would be unreasonable to assume they don't. The magazines are important to the hobby on an emotional and physical level. As for myself, yes, I have decided that electronic content is, for me, inferior. There are electronic versions of various books that I've been given for free. I don't use them. I buy the book if I want the material. I open the book if I want to read the material. As for NDAs, I'm quite familiar with them. The following link describes them in some detail, and was the quickest thing I could link to after a Google search. Now, the NDA should be used to avoid releasing proprietary information. The most important reason is to avoid creating undue competition. The thing about the NDA is that it prevents talking about some things and not others. Now, those under the NDA could avoid talking about anything that isn't specifically detailed to avoid 'giving hints' about what is covered, but the 'cat is out of the bag'. They're willing to say there is a DI, that the content will be electronic, that many of the features are not firmly decided, etc. There is quite a bit of information. It is even possible that the NDA specifically prohibits explaining why an online only model is considered superior by WotC. Still, I don't believe that is the case. They have not said anything that DIRECTLY supports that statement. Some people may want to give the company the benefit of the doubt - I don't. It isn't because I'm never wrong. It's because the company has already lost my trust before this issue in other ways. I proudly subscribe to both magazines. I know that puts me into a 'minority' category of gamers. WotC has told me that my 'minority' doesn't matter to them. While that may not have been their intended message, that's what I keep hearing. So, I'm upset. But not without reason. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Interview with Scott Rouse, Chris Perkins & Bill Slavicsek
Top