Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intimidate!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lord Pendragon" data-source="post: 686089" data-attributes="member: 707"><p>Celebrim, you make a really good case. But I think the rule is written as is basically for two reasons:</p><p></p><p>1. The players have created the PCs' personas. It's their call when the hero hesitates, or his legs turn to jelly. As you rightly said, the DM shouldn't be running the PCs, the players should. If the DM wants to literally control the PCs, he has to use magic.</p><p></p><p>2. The DM doesn't have time to create detailed personas for every NPC in the game. He won't know whether the shopkeeper would or wouldn't be intimidated by a particular threat. Moreover, the player may not be adept at <em>making</em> a threat. So the shorthand has the PC rolling Intimidate to see whether or not his threat works. But when it's PC vs. PC, then the player gets to interpret the other player's threat himself. Granted, this is disadvantageous to the player who's making the threat if he's bad at it, but it's better than a player putting all his points into Intimidate and controlling the rest of his party with die rolls.</p><p></p><p>As you say, the DM can Bluff, and he can Intimidate, but in both cases you're presenting information or attitude, and then allowing the player to assess it. I could tell a player that the giant is so overpowering that his knees feel weak, but it's crossing the line rules-wise (and I think rightly so,) to roll an Intimidate check and--if successful--telling the player that his PC <em>can't</em> move or attack.</p><p></p><p>Likewise with Bluff, you could have an NPC tell the PC that he can sell him the Brooklyn Bridge for cheap, but even with a +100 to Bluff, it should be the player's decision as to whether his PC falls for it, not the dice.</p><p></p><p>Bluff and Intimidate are nice, but they aren't equivalent to <em>Suggestion</em> or <em>Hold Person</em>, after all. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lord Pendragon, post: 686089, member: 707"] Celebrim, you make a really good case. But I think the rule is written as is basically for two reasons: 1. The players have created the PCs' personas. It's their call when the hero hesitates, or his legs turn to jelly. As you rightly said, the DM shouldn't be running the PCs, the players should. If the DM wants to literally control the PCs, he has to use magic. 2. The DM doesn't have time to create detailed personas for every NPC in the game. He won't know whether the shopkeeper would or wouldn't be intimidated by a particular threat. Moreover, the player may not be adept at [i]making[/i] a threat. So the shorthand has the PC rolling Intimidate to see whether or not his threat works. But when it's PC vs. PC, then the player gets to interpret the other player's threat himself. Granted, this is disadvantageous to the player who's making the threat if he's bad at it, but it's better than a player putting all his points into Intimidate and controlling the rest of his party with die rolls. As you say, the DM can Bluff, and he can Intimidate, but in both cases you're presenting information or attitude, and then allowing the player to assess it. I could tell a player that the giant is so overpowering that his knees feel weak, but it's crossing the line rules-wise (and I think rightly so,) to roll an Intimidate check and--if successful--telling the player that his PC [i]can't[/i] move or attack. Likewise with Bluff, you could have an NPC tell the PC that he can sell him the Brooklyn Bridge for cheap, but even with a +100 to Bluff, it should be the player's decision as to whether his PC falls for it, not the dice. Bluff and Intimidate are nice, but they aren't equivalent to [i]Suggestion[/i] or [i]Hold Person[/i], after all. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intimidate!
Top