Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intraclass Unified Mechanics and Siloing of Playstyles Via Keyword
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 5974652" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Here's a topic...</p><p></p><p>What if WotC was able to constrain class bloat by keeping each sub-genre/playstyle version of the classes under one specific skeletal framework. Please note the use of Intra versus Inter - within class...not across the classes. I understood the contempt that Interclass Unified Mechanics has engendered within those who dislike 4es class framework. I am not proposing that. Ok, let us continue. Could Keywords Accomplish this under that framework? Perhaps they could be something such as (And this is just an example. Please don't let conversation focus on nitpicking an example. The important thing is quantifying the various sub-genres/playstyles, representing them with proper powers/features/spells, and siloing them away via keywords):</p><p></p><p>* Grim and Gritty </p><p>* Low/Dark Fantasy </p><p>* High Fantasy</p><p>** Tactical Module</p><p>** Theater of the Mind</p><p></p><p>Given that we are only interested in class mechanics for this thread, we are constraining this to Class Features. Themes/Feats exist as part of the PC Build Resources Framework but are decouple from class mechanics/build resources. Nonetheless, every theme and advanced theme can have the same keywords attached to them to silo them away. </p><p></p><p>Assume that within class A, you get 12 PC Class Features to create the archetype of your desire per 10 levels (arbitrarily derived...not the point of the thread). Let us assume for class A you get the spread of:</p><p></p><p>Level 1 - 2 Class Features</p><p>Level 2 - 1 Class Feature</p><p>Level 3 - 1 Class Feature </p><p>Level 4 - 1 Class Feature</p><p>Level 5 - 1 Class Feature</p><p>Level 6 - 2 Class Features</p><p>Level 7 - 1 Class Feature</p><p>Level 8 - 1 Class Feature</p><p>Level 9 - 1 Class Feature</p><p>Level 10 - 1 Class Feature</p><p></p><p>At each of these levels, you get a certain number of Class Features (0 - 2). Each of these Features can have a specifically tailored mechanical composition to interface with its intended use (** Keyword of either Tactical Module or Theater of the Mind) and a focused flavor/constraint (or lackthereof) for the express purpose of emulating sub-genre (* Keyword of either Grim and Gritty, Low/Dark Fantasy, High Fantasy). One could create a character of muddled composition as a mash-up of different sub-genres and tactical interfaces (if that is their wish and their games/groups are more malleable). However, most importantly, when groups/DMs tastes are more rigid, this would allow people to specifically tailor their characters to their campaign framework, and constrain themselves to their group/DMs style and tastes. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Hopefully this would limit class bloat via the lack of need for redundant classes (which would manifest if we have to silo whole classes away from disapproving eyes and/or tailor several adequate representations of the Fighter, for example, to fit sub-genres). Granted, this would create Class Feature bloat but I suspect that Class Feature bloat would require much less page count than Class Bloat. Further, it would likely be much more elegant and concise as leveraging Key Words aims toward brevity and clarity.</p><p></p><p>Spells can be handled in the same way, allowing Exploration and Intrigue circumventing spells to be powered down or moved to higher levels as table preference dictate.</p><p></p><p>Talk amongst yaselves...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 5974652, member: 6696971"] Here's a topic... What if WotC was able to constrain class bloat by keeping each sub-genre/playstyle version of the classes under one specific skeletal framework. Please note the use of Intra versus Inter - within class...not across the classes. I understood the contempt that Interclass Unified Mechanics has engendered within those who dislike 4es class framework. I am not proposing that. Ok, let us continue. Could Keywords Accomplish this under that framework? Perhaps they could be something such as (And this is just an example. Please don't let conversation focus on nitpicking an example. The important thing is quantifying the various sub-genres/playstyles, representing them with proper powers/features/spells, and siloing them away via keywords): * Grim and Gritty * Low/Dark Fantasy * High Fantasy ** Tactical Module ** Theater of the Mind Given that we are only interested in class mechanics for this thread, we are constraining this to Class Features. Themes/Feats exist as part of the PC Build Resources Framework but are decouple from class mechanics/build resources. Nonetheless, every theme and advanced theme can have the same keywords attached to them to silo them away. Assume that within class A, you get 12 PC Class Features to create the archetype of your desire per 10 levels (arbitrarily derived...not the point of the thread). Let us assume for class A you get the spread of: Level 1 - 2 Class Features Level 2 - 1 Class Feature Level 3 - 1 Class Feature Level 4 - 1 Class Feature Level 5 - 1 Class Feature Level 6 - 2 Class Features Level 7 - 1 Class Feature Level 8 - 1 Class Feature Level 9 - 1 Class Feature Level 10 - 1 Class Feature At each of these levels, you get a certain number of Class Features (0 - 2). Each of these Features can have a specifically tailored mechanical composition to interface with its intended use (** Keyword of either Tactical Module or Theater of the Mind) and a focused flavor/constraint (or lackthereof) for the express purpose of emulating sub-genre (* Keyword of either Grim and Gritty, Low/Dark Fantasy, High Fantasy). One could create a character of muddled composition as a mash-up of different sub-genres and tactical interfaces (if that is their wish and their games/groups are more malleable). However, most importantly, when groups/DMs tastes are more rigid, this would allow people to specifically tailor their characters to their campaign framework, and constrain themselves to their group/DMs style and tastes. Hopefully this would limit class bloat via the lack of need for redundant classes (which would manifest if we have to silo whole classes away from disapproving eyes and/or tailor several adequate representations of the Fighter, for example, to fit sub-genres). Granted, this would create Class Feature bloat but I suspect that Class Feature bloat would require much less page count than Class Bloat. Further, it would likely be much more elegant and concise as leveraging Key Words aims toward brevity and clarity. Spells can be handled in the same way, allowing Exploration and Intrigue circumventing spells to be powered down or moved to higher levels as table preference dictate. Talk amongst yaselves... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intraclass Unified Mechanics and Siloing of Playstyles Via Keyword
Top