Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intrinsic Nature (RAW v RAI)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5914782" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>It is true that Summons with Intrinsic Nature just need to be given ANY command to avoid the nature kicking in. OTOH not all of these intrinsics are actually BAD, sometimes they can be leveraged in your favor (it helps that they're spelled out, so you really would know in any given situation if it would help you or not). </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure there is really a difference here between RAI and RAW. It is hard to say what exactly is specifically intended. If you're going to elaborate on summoned creatures behavior and motivations and have that interact with the mechanics then it is hard to say there is a specific intent beyond that the actions are in keeping with the creature's description. I think that is more "DM leeway" verging into houserule territory than an RAI issue. </p><p></p><p>In any case, if you feel that a PC is managing to abuse the intrinsic nature of a summons excessively in a way that bugs the people at the table, then by all means tweak it. Just remember that it is a daily attack slot and wizards have a lot of other good choices for those slots. Summons are not generally their #1 optimal choice, even the ones that have no nature. Turning this stuff too much against the caster is likely to just mean nobody will bother with summons, which would be a shame.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5914782, member: 82106"] It is true that Summons with Intrinsic Nature just need to be given ANY command to avoid the nature kicking in. OTOH not all of these intrinsics are actually BAD, sometimes they can be leveraged in your favor (it helps that they're spelled out, so you really would know in any given situation if it would help you or not). I'm not sure there is really a difference here between RAI and RAW. It is hard to say what exactly is specifically intended. If you're going to elaborate on summoned creatures behavior and motivations and have that interact with the mechanics then it is hard to say there is a specific intent beyond that the actions are in keeping with the creature's description. I think that is more "DM leeway" verging into houserule territory than an RAI issue. In any case, if you feel that a PC is managing to abuse the intrinsic nature of a summons excessively in a way that bugs the people at the table, then by all means tweak it. Just remember that it is a daily attack slot and wizards have a lot of other good choices for those slots. Summons are not generally their #1 optimal choice, even the ones that have no nature. Turning this stuff too much against the caster is likely to just mean nobody will bother with summons, which would be a shame. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Intrinsic Nature (RAW v RAI)
Top