Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 738736" data-attributes="member: 3424">I don't know - it makes perfect sense to me to ignore an opponent that has little chance of injuring you in order to concentrate fully on another that will damage you severely if you take your eyes off him for a moment.Consider this scenario: a weretiger is being flanked by a fighter with a normal longsword and a rogue carrying a silver +1 shapeshifter bane longsword.  Assuming for the sake of argument that the weretiger knows the situation it's in, wouldn't it want to ignore the fighter in order to prevent the rogue from getting its flanking bonus plus sneak attack?Maybe a combatant (call him O) that wants to ignore one of its attackers (call him A) in order to focus on another (call him B) has to make a Concentration check DC 10 + damage dealt by A to do so.  O has to make the Concentration check after A's action.  If he fails, he is still flanked by B until A's next action.  If he suceeds, he is not flanked by B.  Either way, O treats A as invisible.  O does not get his Dex bonus against A, and A gets a +2 bonus to hit for being effectively invisible on top of the +2 bonus to hit since he flanks O.Does this sound fair?</blockquote>