Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Invisibility + Fighter's Mark = ??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4596389" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>:facepalm:</p><p></p><p>You missed the point.</p><p></p><p>The strict rules about it is a blank slate. There's nothing saying you can't immediately interrupt an action that you cannot see. (which is not the same as cannot detect). There's nothing saying either way and you as a DM have to make a call. You can't even HAVE set rules in such an instance because there's too many variables that make an interpretation right one with this time, but not right this other time. It's part of a DM's skillset to be able to make these calls in such a manner that is logical from the manner of the story run and the situation at hand. You can't give 'strict rules lawyer' advice in a situation like this because there IS no strict rules law in this situation. That's why you'll get suggestions rather than strict rules argument.</p><p></p><p>That said, if you determine that you need to be able to -detect- the invisible guy then there's rules available to determine how to detect him. It's a Stealth/Perception situation. If you end your thinking at the previous paragraph however, then you just allow the immediate interrupt.</p><p></p><p>However, the interrupter needs to be able to guess which square the provoking shifter was in before he shifted. This may be easy and trivial, or it may be difficult and impossible, that can only be determined in context of the battle itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 4596389, member: 71571"] :facepalm: You missed the point. The strict rules about it is a blank slate. There's nothing saying you can't immediately interrupt an action that you cannot see. (which is not the same as cannot detect). There's nothing saying either way and you as a DM have to make a call. You can't even HAVE set rules in such an instance because there's too many variables that make an interpretation right one with this time, but not right this other time. It's part of a DM's skillset to be able to make these calls in such a manner that is logical from the manner of the story run and the situation at hand. You can't give 'strict rules lawyer' advice in a situation like this because there IS no strict rules law in this situation. That's why you'll get suggestions rather than strict rules argument. That said, if you determine that you need to be able to -detect- the invisible guy then there's rules available to determine how to detect him. It's a Stealth/Perception situation. If you end your thinking at the previous paragraph however, then you just allow the immediate interrupt. However, the interrupter needs to be able to guess which square the provoking shifter was in before he shifted. This may be easy and trivial, or it may be difficult and impossible, that can only be determined in context of the battle itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Invisibility + Fighter's Mark = ??
Top