Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 319652" data-attributes="member: 2011">Seems like a real stretch to me.Attacks are attacks, even touch attacks.I think this explanation is a lot less likely then they didn't want someone to cast a touch attack, have their ally cast Gaseous Form on them, and then have them ambush someone when the GF wears off (and I find this extremely unlikely).I think the real reason was that in playtesting, someone tried to hang onto their touch attack spell casting both spells and even though the normal touch attack rules disallow that, they added it in to clarify. It's even possible that all of the touch rules were not all in place during part of playtesting.Plus, they have a boatload of clarifications in multiple places, even though you really only need in it one. This seems the most reasonable.Probably, but I doubt it is the "let me brush up against him" one. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />But, we'll probably never know. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>