Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wrathamon" data-source="post: 1957456" data-attributes="member: 7989">Too me sneak attacks are just that "sneaky" you either nail a target who is not aware of you(surprise), off balance(flat footed), or in combat with someone else(flank).Feint causes someone to become off-balance letting you get in a good hit.The invisible blade class is suppose to be the blow that you never saw.I believe it was the intention of the design when reading the fluff that this wouldn't be a flurry of attacks but one well placed blow that the target didnt see or expect.That is why I like the Swift action. You get one attack that gets sneak damage plus you get your other attacks during a full attack action. The one that the target didnt expect cost him his life.I am changing it to intermediate action because I like the idea of the Invivisble blade not being a percieved threat and the enemy ignored him and runs by thinking a dagger isnt going to do much damage if he can even hit me, but that was during the moment the blade strikes, plunging his dagger into a kidney or something.Why flank? if you can just keep rolling "free" bluff checks for all your attacks, and reroll when you fail till you succeed. A DM can say you have a limit to one bluff "feint" per attack, but I prefer the flavor or the swift and intermediate actions for this ability.You dont have to use it, I just thought it was a good idea and works Great n my games and the players like it that use IBs before.-w</blockquote>

Verification