Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Invisible, hidden and within 5 feet of an enemy making a ranged attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 8722081" data-attributes="member: 59057"><p>Thanks, I'd love to.</p><p></p><p>I think rules are important. Otherwise the game aspect of RPG is not there.</p><p>It's just that the designers can't anticipate every situation and cover them in the rulebook, or otherwise you have unnecessarily big books and so much rules you can't remember anyway. </p><p></p><p>Also, as you can see in the example of stealth rules in former editions, no matter how often they are errataed, some corner case is forgotten or worse, when one is covered, a differen one is created. </p><p>Or lighting rules and concealment in 5e. Everyone knows how it works in the real world, but writing a rule for that, so it always works correctly is nit that easy. </p><p></p><p>So what I do is trying to apply rules as rigid as possible, because otherwise players don't have a frame to rely on. But in the described scenario, I would possibly just rule wrong, because I might not remember the exact wording and I rule on the spot, and in most cases noone would object, as long as I am close enough to the actual rule (because I am usually the one who remembers rules most correctly). </p><p>Then of course in this case: if the invisible and hidden creature is not trying to annoy the shooter, I can't imagine many situations, why it should close to melee range anyway and not just stay 10ft away. </p><p>So If I'd remembere the rule correctly, I'd just inform the player: do you really want to close to melee range, because there is a good chance the archer might accidently bump into you and you are detected. Or at least, he will at least somehow feel air swirling around him by your movement and will be distracted (and gains disadvantage) but might be aware, that something around him is foul and might look for you. </p><p>And if the player says: yes, this is exactly what I want: I close to melee range, and if the archer tries to shoot at my friends, I will immidiately attack him (ready action to attack on trigger shooting).</p><p>So in most cases, where closing to 5ft of an archer as an invisible hidden creature, there won't be a problem anyway with those rules, so we might have gmfun games together, without ever coming to a situation where we had an argument about rules.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 8722081, member: 59057"] Thanks, I'd love to. I think rules are important. Otherwise the game aspect of RPG is not there. It's just that the designers can't anticipate every situation and cover them in the rulebook, or otherwise you have unnecessarily big books and so much rules you can't remember anyway. Also, as you can see in the example of stealth rules in former editions, no matter how often they are errataed, some corner case is forgotten or worse, when one is covered, a differen one is created. Or lighting rules and concealment in 5e. Everyone knows how it works in the real world, but writing a rule for that, so it always works correctly is nit that easy. So what I do is trying to apply rules as rigid as possible, because otherwise players don't have a frame to rely on. But in the described scenario, I would possibly just rule wrong, because I might not remember the exact wording and I rule on the spot, and in most cases noone would object, as long as I am close enough to the actual rule (because I am usually the one who remembers rules most correctly). Then of course in this case: if the invisible and hidden creature is not trying to annoy the shooter, I can't imagine many situations, why it should close to melee range anyway and not just stay 10ft away. So If I'd remembere the rule correctly, I'd just inform the player: do you really want to close to melee range, because there is a good chance the archer might accidently bump into you and you are detected. Or at least, he will at least somehow feel air swirling around him by your movement and will be distracted (and gains disadvantage) but might be aware, that something around him is foul and might look for you. And if the player says: yes, this is exactly what I want: I close to melee range, and if the archer tries to shoot at my friends, I will immidiately attack him (ready action to attack on trigger shooting). So in most cases, where closing to 5ft of an archer as an invisible hidden creature, there won't be a problem anyway with those rules, so we might have gmfun games together, without ever coming to a situation where we had an argument about rules. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Invisible, hidden and within 5 feet of an enemy making a ranged attack
Top