Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
IQ to INT equivalent
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xeriar" data-source="post: 949061" data-attributes="member: 4116"><p>It's called the g factor.</p><p></p><p>Whatever tests for any sort of intellegence you come up with, people who do well in one will tend to do well in another.</p><p></p><p>Supposedly with word association being the king of this heap. Proponents claim it has the highest correllation but I suspect this has to do with more well-read people tending to appear more intelligent in general.</p><p></p><p>Basically, there is a single general ability for intelligence underlying it all, and this is what IQ tests attempt to get at.</p><p></p><p>There are another group of correlations between tests, called s-factors.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>There are problems with this, of course.</p><p></p><p>Savant syndrome or idiot savant syndrome, which you probably already know of. Basically, one specific area of intelligence becomes overdeveloped, seemingly at the expense of others.</p><p></p><p>Autism also throws this a bit out of whack, especially as some are considering that autism may not actually be a defective condition.</p><p></p><p>Finally, certain areas of the brain control certain intelligences. If they are damaged, ability in a certain area can seriously suffer.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Both the g-factor and multiple intelligences have a lot of support behind them.</p><p></p><p>Even if IQ tests had a serious white-male cultural bias, this is less the case now than it used to be. The g factor isn't just a stupid white male concept - many people who are brilliant in one area tend to be brilliant in many areas.</p><p></p><p>However, there are at least nine areas of 'intelligence' which can not only be localized to specific parts of the brain, but have autistic/idiot savant members who excel in one of these areas.</p><p></p><p>So far, these are:</p><p>1: Linguistic Intelligence. The ability to use language. Poets tend to have the most focus here, but any sort of writing works.</p><p></p><p>This does not govern how many languages a person knows, of course.</p><p></p><p>2: Logical-Mathematical Intelligence. Pretty self explanatory. Speaking from personal experience, the creative side of this is invention itself. Being able to see a problem and come up with a new way to solve it, I mean.</p><p></p><p>3: Spatial Intelligence. How well you can see with your mind, so to speak. Painters and sculptors tend to focus here.</p><p></p><p>4: Body-Kinesthetic Intelligence. How well you use your body. Hand-eye coordination included. On the creative side, dancers and actors specialize here.</p><p></p><p>5: Musical Intelligence. The ability to see and hear patterns. The creative side of this needs no explanation.</p><p></p><p>6: Interpersonal Intelligence. Empathy - how you deal with other people.</p><p></p><p>7: Intrapersonal Intelligence. 'Know thyself' - knowing your own abilities and limitations.</p><p></p><p>8: Naturalist Intelligence. The ability to differentiate between living things and other things in nature (rocks, clouds). On the creative side, it's also an aesthetic sense.</p><p></p><p>9: Moral 'Intelligence'. Distinguishing between right and wrong. It's kind of a half, but there are instances where people get a specific area of the brain destroyed and seem to lose all moral sense.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>I tend to think both are right. There is an overall general base, and, depending on how people's minds are forged, some will come out ahead of others.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xeriar, post: 949061, member: 4116"] It's called the g factor. Whatever tests for any sort of intellegence you come up with, people who do well in one will tend to do well in another. Supposedly with word association being the king of this heap. Proponents claim it has the highest correllation but I suspect this has to do with more well-read people tending to appear more intelligent in general. Basically, there is a single general ability for intelligence underlying it all, and this is what IQ tests attempt to get at. There are another group of correlations between tests, called s-factors. --- There are problems with this, of course. Savant syndrome or idiot savant syndrome, which you probably already know of. Basically, one specific area of intelligence becomes overdeveloped, seemingly at the expense of others. Autism also throws this a bit out of whack, especially as some are considering that autism may not actually be a defective condition. Finally, certain areas of the brain control certain intelligences. If they are damaged, ability in a certain area can seriously suffer. --- Both the g-factor and multiple intelligences have a lot of support behind them. Even if IQ tests had a serious white-male cultural bias, this is less the case now than it used to be. The g factor isn't just a stupid white male concept - many people who are brilliant in one area tend to be brilliant in many areas. However, there are at least nine areas of 'intelligence' which can not only be localized to specific parts of the brain, but have autistic/idiot savant members who excel in one of these areas. So far, these are: 1: Linguistic Intelligence. The ability to use language. Poets tend to have the most focus here, but any sort of writing works. This does not govern how many languages a person knows, of course. 2: Logical-Mathematical Intelligence. Pretty self explanatory. Speaking from personal experience, the creative side of this is invention itself. Being able to see a problem and come up with a new way to solve it, I mean. 3: Spatial Intelligence. How well you can see with your mind, so to speak. Painters and sculptors tend to focus here. 4: Body-Kinesthetic Intelligence. How well you use your body. Hand-eye coordination included. On the creative side, dancers and actors specialize here. 5: Musical Intelligence. The ability to see and hear patterns. The creative side of this needs no explanation. 6: Interpersonal Intelligence. Empathy - how you deal with other people. 7: Intrapersonal Intelligence. 'Know thyself' - knowing your own abilities and limitations. 8: Naturalist Intelligence. The ability to differentiate between living things and other things in nature (rocks, clouds). On the creative side, it's also an aesthetic sense. 9: Moral 'Intelligence'. Distinguishing between right and wrong. It's kind of a half, but there are instances where people get a specific area of the brain destroyed and seem to lose all moral sense. --- I tend to think both are right. There is an overall general base, and, depending on how people's minds are forged, some will come out ahead of others. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
IQ to INT equivalent
Top