Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(IR) 4th ooc-thread of the 5th IR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guilt Puppy" data-source="post: 1949849" data-attributes="member: 6521"><p>Serpenteye: PLs look fine. (Note to all: The 5 Epic PL should not be taken as an indication that there are, in fact, five members of the Elder Circle. Nor should this statement be taken is an indication that there are more or less than five members of the Elder Circle.)</p><p></p><p>Also, I got your email (twice, in fact)... Re: the map, I'm thinking it may just be easier for me to maintain it by hand, and I am willing to do that. At this point updating it by hand over the course of several months probably constitutes less work than the task of automating a map so large.</p><p></p><p>Edena/Eclavdra:</p><p></p><p>Your proposals regarding Infiltration seem to muddy the issue unduly. We need, at most, a clause specifying that Infiltration is to be considered a military act; given that, the rest of your proposals fall naturally from the existing terms.</p><p></p><p>Further, we would like to clarify that, in our opinion, equivalent response should not imply <em>identical</em> response. For an act of infiltration matching the threat of 10,000 men, a conventional army of 10,000 men should suffice as response. This should not be taken loosely, however, and any power not offering clearly identical response should take the time to explain completely their reason in determining their response's equivalence.</p><p></p><p>To allow this flexibility is vital on two accounts:</p><p>- Firstly, because our powers possess many unique strengths and weaknesses. It does no good to force a power to respond to attack in its weakest or least proficient manner. Furthermore, in some cases and identical response may not be available to a power at all.</p><p>- Second, identical response provides our enemies with too much knowledge. A power that believes it can guard itself from, for instance, an anticipated mass infiltration, may choose to infiltrate one of our members with lessened fear of retribution.</p><p></p><p>It may be necessary to define some terms for equivalence -- what act of infiltration is equal to a conventional attack of 10,000 men, and so forth. The Brotherhood suggests that these terms be developed over time, by law of precedent.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guilt Puppy, post: 1949849, member: 6521"] Serpenteye: PLs look fine. (Note to all: The 5 Epic PL should not be taken as an indication that there are, in fact, five members of the Elder Circle. Nor should this statement be taken is an indication that there are more or less than five members of the Elder Circle.) Also, I got your email (twice, in fact)... Re: the map, I'm thinking it may just be easier for me to maintain it by hand, and I am willing to do that. At this point updating it by hand over the course of several months probably constitutes less work than the task of automating a map so large. Edena/Eclavdra: Your proposals regarding Infiltration seem to muddy the issue unduly. We need, at most, a clause specifying that Infiltration is to be considered a military act; given that, the rest of your proposals fall naturally from the existing terms. Further, we would like to clarify that, in our opinion, equivalent response should not imply [i]identical[/i] response. For an act of infiltration matching the threat of 10,000 men, a conventional army of 10,000 men should suffice as response. This should not be taken loosely, however, and any power not offering clearly identical response should take the time to explain completely their reason in determining their response's equivalence. To allow this flexibility is vital on two accounts: - Firstly, because our powers possess many unique strengths and weaknesses. It does no good to force a power to respond to attack in its weakest or least proficient manner. Furthermore, in some cases and identical response may not be available to a power at all. - Second, identical response provides our enemies with too much knowledge. A power that believes it can guard itself from, for instance, an anticipated mass infiltration, may choose to infiltrate one of our members with lessened fear of retribution. It may be necessary to define some terms for equivalence -- what act of infiltration is equal to a conventional attack of 10,000 men, and so forth. The Brotherhood suggests that these terms be developed over time, by law of precedent. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
(IR) 4th ooc-thread of the 5th IR
Top