NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CleverNickName" data-source="post: 5221009" data-attributes="member: 50987">I don't have a problem with it, honestly; I was just worried about fairness.  With all three judges critiquing the contest, it didn't seem fair to let only one of them pick the ingredients.  I didn't want to give one judge any kind of edge over the other two.There are several ways we can do it, I guess...some of them are more complicated than others.1.  We randomly select a judge to provide the ingredients;2.  We let the contestants choose which judge will provide the list of ingredients;3.  All judges work together to create a "Super List" of ingredients;4.  Each judge submits 2 of their favorite ingredients (without collaborating), which I will then dump onto the contestants in the final round;5.  The ingredients are chosen by an unbiased outsider who is neither participating nor judging (me);6.  Each judge sends me 6 ingredients.  I write them on slips of paper, put them in a hat, and randomly draw 6 of them out; or7.  We could roll 1d6 on this table. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Judges: which option do you like best?  I only picked #5 because it was the easiest.  Besides, my list is rather...unorthodox.  I'll send you all a PM about it, and see if you guys think it is a good idea.</blockquote>

Verification