Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="humble minion" data-source="post: 8154451" data-attributes="member: 5948">Looking forward to seeing you next time around [USER=23484]@Kobold Stew[/USER] - i really enjoyed reading your entry.Can't argue with most of the comments on my entry, [USER=57112]@Gradine[/USER] picked up all my little fudges and dodges with laserlike focus!  I knew my gnomes probably weren't quite rampaging enough (Lobdiddle was, but he's only one guy, and the ingredient called for gnomes plural...), that my curse probably wasn't quite disease-like or contagious enough to be truly pestilential, and that my use of the 'civilised magic' ingredient was a bit questionably abstract.  And yeah, I didn't like that the first part of the ritual would succeed regardless of player actions either - if i'd had more wordcount or was running this in real game i probably would have given the PCs some sort of bonus or advantage in the final confrontation if they'd succeeded in forcing the gnomes to do a bargain-basement version of the ritual without them.  Interesting to read the comment about the triple cross - I did actually consider using some sort of tripartite crucifix or something in the entry - in a Buffy scenario, vampires and crosses are a very easy fit of course, but it would have meant somehow introducing vampires into an entry that was way too complicated and had too many antagonists for the word limit already.</blockquote>