Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Imaculata" data-source="post: 8167017" data-attributes="member: 6801286">My thoughts on the last two entries:[spoiler]I like how the two entries couldn't be more different from one another. Postmortem went unexpectedly deep on its lore and setting, providing a type of adventure that is really unique in its structure. I'm a bit sad its originality didn't earn it more points, though it is hard to disagree with the critique regarding the use of the ingredients.Race to the bottom on the other hand is fairly mundane as far as adventures go, but also pretty straight forward to run because of it. It is an easy plug and play adventure in my view. Simplicity can be a good thing. Its use of the Unlightable Lantern is also very strong, and very reminiscent of classic TSR modules.Fitz already expressed some of his disappointment with his own entry, and his writers block. I can see what he means. It is not exactly an entry that blew me away. But, I do understand the adventure easily, and I feel it is something just about any DM could put in their campaign as a side adventure, without much trouble. In that respect, I think the mundaneness actually did it a lot of favors. Structurally, it is a solid and cohesive adventure. Not spectacular, but easy to run.Postmortem impressed me more. But if I had to choose which of the two to actually run as a DM, it would probably be Race to the bottom. I love the bitter irony in the name of the adventure btw.[/spoiler]</blockquote>

Verification