Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
IRON DM 2020 Tournament Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rune" data-source="post: 8168814" data-attributes="member: 67"><p>[spoiler]Okay. I’ll clarify my position. Despite the 5-1 ingredient split, i didn’t find that most of them were <em>significantly</em> better (although a couple definitely were). It’s a deceptive 5-1. In context, very nearly 3-3.</p><p></p><p>And when I weighed that against the structural issues I found in your entry, it made things tough. Those issues would (very likely, in my estimation) be pretty impactful to the experience of running the game. To be clear, the technological assumptions I called out are not the root of those issues, they are just one of the ways things could get derailed.</p><p></p><p>Fundamentally, your entry was very linear through a large part of it and there were a lot of points where things could <em>easily</em> go off course. And I’m talking about things that <em>need</em> to happen to get the adventure to it’s next step, like the pirates succeeding in their initial raid, the <em>pirate captain</em> surviving the raid, the <em>steamship</em> surviving the raid, the life raft surviving the escape, the pirate captain’s dino surviving long enough for a chase to happen.</p><p></p><p>(The laser sword and gatling guns seem like they would make each of those things more likely to get derailed, but it could still happen without.)</p><p></p><p>No doubt that would all get cleaned up with a second draft, but this version offers the DM <em>nothing</em> in the way of guidance if any one of those things happens. So, yeah. I had to go the other way.</p><p></p><p>Nevertheless, I remain sincere in expressing my admiration for the entry you put forth. Its cinematic and exciting through-line still looks like it would be a blast; I just know I’d have to prepare some contingencies.</p><p></p><p>And, I’m going to reiterate this more for the peanut gallery than for you, but I’m serious when I say, <em>I do not believe I could do anywhere near as good a job as you did in one hour, let alone twenty-five minutes! </em></p><p></p><p>I <em>am</em> impressed. [/spoiler]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rune, post: 8168814, member: 67"] [spoiler]Okay. I’ll clarify my position. Despite the 5-1 ingredient split, i didn’t find that most of them were [I]significantly[/I] better (although a couple definitely were). It’s a deceptive 5-1. In context, very nearly 3-3. And when I weighed that against the structural issues I found in your entry, it made things tough. Those issues would (very likely, in my estimation) be pretty impactful to the experience of running the game. To be clear, the technological assumptions I called out are not the root of those issues, they are just one of the ways things could get derailed. Fundamentally, your entry was very linear through a large part of it and there were a lot of points where things could [I]easily[/I] go off course. And I’m talking about things that [I]need[/I] to happen to get the adventure to it’s next step, like the pirates succeeding in their initial raid, the [I]pirate captain[/I] surviving the raid, the [I]steamship[/I] surviving the raid, the life raft surviving the escape, the pirate captain’s dino surviving long enough for a chase to happen. (The laser sword and gatling guns seem like they would make each of those things more likely to get derailed, but it could still happen without.) No doubt that would all get cleaned up with a second draft, but this version offers the DM [I]nothing[/I] in the way of guidance if any one of those things happens. So, yeah. I had to go the other way. Nevertheless, I remain sincere in expressing my admiration for the entry you put forth. Its cinematic and exciting through-line still looks like it would be a blast; I just know I’d have to prepare some contingencies. And, I’m going to reiterate this more for the peanut gallery than for you, but I’m serious when I say, [I]I do not believe I could do anywhere near as good a job as you did in one hour, let alone twenty-five minutes! [/I] I [I]am[/I] impressed. [/spoiler] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
IRON DM 2020 Tournament Thread
Top