Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gradine" data-source="post: 8173247" data-attributes="member: 57112">[SPOILER="Response"]Generally speaking, naming something after the ingredient is seen as one of weakest ways to use it, and sends a red flag to the judges. The one issue with your adventure is that Act 1 and Act 2 don't tie together very well, thematically. This normally wouldn't be a huge issue, as a general adventure. With Iron DM, we want all the ingredients to feel central to the main adventure. This is why I say that if the two acts felt more strongly connected, then the first act would ultimately feel weightier and the ingredients from that act would feel more central and critical as part of the whole. This is just me, though. We've still got two more judges, and we all think and judge a little bit differently. I'm excited to see how the rest of them go![/SPOILER]</blockquote>