Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Iron DM: format and philosophy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rune" data-source="post: 1000601" data-attributes="member: 67"><p>First of all, don't sell yourself short, cool hand luke. It is true that you need to work on refinement before you'll ever have a real shot at the championship, but trust me when I say this--<em>you've got what it takes.</em></p><p></p><p>Second, about seeding. That's actually more or less what happened in the first round of this game, although it wasn't specifically planned that way. Seasong, Wulf, Nemmerle, and Greybar all had significant Iron DM backgrounds when coming into the tournament.</p><p></p><p>In my first tournament, both contestants (Radiating Gnome and myself) who actually made it to round 3 were new players and had surprising upsets. In Radiating gnome's case, he actually won round one with a weak entry (although that wasn't the surprisng upset). In my case, I was up against Wicht in the second round! I was sweating bullets, let me assure you. I managed to put together my best entry, ever, and <em>just barely</em> beat him. I doubt I could do it again (and, I actually lost to him in a rematch the next tournament).</p><p></p><p>What's my point? I guess it's that seeding isn't necessary in the first round; nor would it significantly change the outcome of the tournament.</p><p></p><p>The second round, however, I did specifically determine who would go against whom, although I based it mostly upon smack-talk up to that point, and possible 3rd round combinations.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's the right attitude for Iron DM. I'd also like to suggest that doing a league format would weaken the tendency for this attitude to prevail.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In this case, we had already determined that we wanted a quarterly game, but other than that, it was more or less the second one. I asked Nemm about it, he said he was too busy to run it and I said, I'd do it. He said, "Okay."</p><p></p><p>Now, I won't even try to pretend to be humble and say that it was all luck that the spots filled up so quickly. I've played in enough of these things to have a pretty good feel for what works, and what kind of pacing is needed.</p><p></p><p>I knew I had a decent reputation as a player, so I figured a few heavy-hitters would be willing to trust me. I posted my intention to run the game a day before I accepted entries to make sure more people had a chance to see it, but I knew there would be a side-effect; the spots would fill up more rappidly. In this case, the 8 primary spots filled up <em>in slightly more than half an hour!</em>.</p><p></p><p>But that was just the beginning. I knew that I had to keep the pace quick and scheduled as many of the first-round matches for the first day for that reason. I was able to cut back a bit for the later matches.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Less stress? But this is Iron DM! It's <em>supposed</em> to be stressful. It should be obvious why it should be stressful on the players, but perhaps I should say something about the judges.</p><p></p><p>The more stress they have, the better; it helps people to have faith in the judge, if the judge is willing to (knowingly) take on the weighty responsibilities of judgement.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Pie, if Nemmerle wants to defend his title, he's going to have to <em>play</em>. That means you may well get your chance to run the next one (especially as I think someone else has plans to run a RBDM one at some point--with a panel of judges, no less).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rune, post: 1000601, member: 67"] First of all, don't sell yourself short, cool hand luke. It is true that you need to work on refinement before you'll ever have a real shot at the championship, but trust me when I say this--[i]you've got what it takes.[/i] Second, about seeding. That's actually more or less what happened in the first round of this game, although it wasn't specifically planned that way. Seasong, Wulf, Nemmerle, and Greybar all had significant Iron DM backgrounds when coming into the tournament. In my first tournament, both contestants (Radiating Gnome and myself) who actually made it to round 3 were new players and had surprising upsets. In Radiating gnome's case, he actually won round one with a weak entry (although that wasn't the surprisng upset). In my case, I was up against Wicht in the second round! I was sweating bullets, let me assure you. I managed to put together my best entry, ever, and [i]just barely[/i] beat him. I doubt I could do it again (and, I actually lost to him in a rematch the next tournament). What's my point? I guess it's that seeding isn't necessary in the first round; nor would it significantly change the outcome of the tournament. The second round, however, I did specifically determine who would go against whom, although I based it mostly upon smack-talk up to that point, and possible 3rd round combinations. That's the right attitude for Iron DM. I'd also like to suggest that doing a league format would weaken the tendency for this attitude to prevail. In this case, we had already determined that we wanted a quarterly game, but other than that, it was more or less the second one. I asked Nemm about it, he said he was too busy to run it and I said, I'd do it. He said, "Okay." Now, I won't even try to pretend to be humble and say that it was all luck that the spots filled up so quickly. I've played in enough of these things to have a pretty good feel for what works, and what kind of pacing is needed. I knew I had a decent reputation as a player, so I figured a few heavy-hitters would be willing to trust me. I posted my intention to run the game a day before I accepted entries to make sure more people had a chance to see it, but I knew there would be a side-effect; the spots would fill up more rappidly. In this case, the 8 primary spots filled up [i]in slightly more than half an hour![/i]. But that was just the beginning. I knew that I had to keep the pace quick and scheduled as many of the first-round matches for the first day for that reason. I was able to cut back a bit for the later matches. Less stress? But this is Iron DM! It's [i]supposed[/i] to be stressful. It should be obvious why it should be stressful on the players, but perhaps I should say something about the judges. The more stress they have, the better; it helps people to have faith in the judge, if the judge is willing to (knowingly) take on the weighty responsibilities of judgement. Pie, if Nemmerle wants to defend his title, he's going to have to [i]play[/i]. That means you may well get your chance to run the next one (especially as I think someone else has plans to run a RBDM one at some point--with a panel of judges, no less). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Iron DM: format and philosophy
Top