Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kaos" data-source="post: 2477396" data-attributes="member: 10644">From what I've heard of the playtesting, the Arcanist didn't do much invoking of the magic system itself.  And in order to 'not focus on the magic,' I'd either have to hope that the 'issues' I see are never invoked or excise the Arcanist entirely.I'm not fond of either of those options.  This line of conversation runs great risk of invoking old Monte-bashing habits that I said I would give up after hearing about IH  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />Don't know enough about Midnight, but the Arcanist-as-written doesn't use tokens as a class feature anyway.  They're a Cool New Feature, not a system-requirement.There are other options.  Folks who have time and like to tinker are tinkering, and their results should show up at the Iron League(?) eventually.  Other options include converting an appropriate spellcasting class (suggestions so far include the warlock, AE classes or the channeler from midnight.) Just want to echo this.  I may be loudly complaining about one section of the game, but only because I have a hard time justifying a post that says nothing more than "This ****ing rocks!"  Which is how I feel about everthing else.</blockquote>