Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Irritating Habits of HR People
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneLigon" data-source="post: 2530672" data-attributes="member: 3649"><p>I would guess it would depend on the mix of other people they'd be working with and how they might get along, especially if you're hiring for a position that regularly works in a team. The first person who has the best technical qualifications might not be the best person for the job. I can think of a couple people who are qualified as hell as far as technical aspects go but they're virtually unhirable because they can't get along with people in a team situation for longer than six months, or in one where they might have to serve two or more masters. They're working in positions far below what they are technically capable of because of this; the companies can get some use out of their skills and don't have to subject others to their presence. They'll stay where they are until they die, though. </p><p></p><p>If those companies had not shopped, they'd be stuck with these guys in more prominant positions. Firing them due to certain considerations would not be easy. They more than likely would have adversely affected the team productivity and led to lower morale for the rest of the people that had to depend on them.</p><p></p><p>Also, you shop because you might get a bargain <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> You get Professional A who has a wife and kids and a home. You get Professional B who is a single guy. Both are equally competent in their job. In some cases, you might want B because he's going to work cheaper than A. In some cases you might want A despite his higher price tag because he'll mesh better with the more seasoned and mature people on the team position you're trying to fill, where B might be too much of an outsider.</p><p></p><p>Another consideration, sad to say, might be the race or sex of the person. If company policy says that a woman needs to be in that position now because otherwise you might start getting complaints from other departments or a closer look from Federal officials, you hire the most competant woman you can get. She may or may not be the most technically qualified of the applicants, but in addition to the 'HR game', HR sometimes has to play the 'let's not open ourselves to a lawsuit' game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneLigon, post: 2530672, member: 3649"] I would guess it would depend on the mix of other people they'd be working with and how they might get along, especially if you're hiring for a position that regularly works in a team. The first person who has the best technical qualifications might not be the best person for the job. I can think of a couple people who are qualified as hell as far as technical aspects go but they're virtually unhirable because they can't get along with people in a team situation for longer than six months, or in one where they might have to serve two or more masters. They're working in positions far below what they are technically capable of because of this; the companies can get some use out of their skills and don't have to subject others to their presence. They'll stay where they are until they die, though. If those companies had not shopped, they'd be stuck with these guys in more prominant positions. Firing them due to certain considerations would not be easy. They more than likely would have adversely affected the team productivity and led to lower morale for the rest of the people that had to depend on them. Also, you shop because you might get a bargain :) You get Professional A who has a wife and kids and a home. You get Professional B who is a single guy. Both are equally competent in their job. In some cases, you might want B because he's going to work cheaper than A. In some cases you might want A despite his higher price tag because he'll mesh better with the more seasoned and mature people on the team position you're trying to fill, where B might be too much of an outsider. Another consideration, sad to say, might be the race or sex of the person. If company policy says that a woman needs to be in that position now because otherwise you might start getting complaints from other departments or a closer look from Federal officials, you hire the most competant woman you can get. She may or may not be the most technically qualified of the applicants, but in addition to the 'HR game', HR sometimes has to play the 'let's not open ourselves to a lawsuit' game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Irritating Habits of HR People
Top