Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 1987791" data-attributes="member: 172">True, but my point was not made with respect to either of these conditions, but with respect to the way that things were being done, i.e., "stacks as defined ad hoc in the spell description."These convention also cut down on the possibilities for creativity in spell effects and are a bit less logical from a modeling point of view. I mean, it makes sense that a bless spell that give you a +2 divine bonus instead of +1 is more of the same, so it makes sense that they wouldn't stack. But why would it, for example, prevent some other effect from working.Not to mention that with the former (everything stacks) means that the capabilities of rules exploiters vary directly with each new spell or effect you add to the pile. Limiting stacking means that you can add to the ruleset without the same implicit power escalation.</blockquote>