Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is 3rd edition too "quantitative"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DungeonMaster" data-source="post: 1999308" data-attributes="member: 27431"><p>That's a good way of reasoning - I guess I could say you've never seen a fig/mu in actual play and that destroys your entire argument as well? </p><p></p><p>Gestahlts are insane. They're 3.5 too. PrC are omnipresent. </p><p></p><p></p><p>You know what I mean. Do it casually, no dice rolls, like in 3.5. </p><p></p><p></p><p>So if I apply the same logic as above all items are optional in 1st edition and up to the DM? Even with those items you don't kill balrogs, pitfiends, gelugons and the whole host of Type whatever devils and demons in one round without rolling a single die, no save no SR. </p><p>The 19th level MU has to contend with 60% magic resistance and is not even CLOSE to as damaging as the cleric. Try again if you really want but I'll be ultimately surprised if you can come even close to Andy Collin's uber broken holy word and the general 3.5 trend to not label caster level increase. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Core 3.5 DMG PrC. Just like the I don't know, Eldricht Knight? that screams of fig/mu to me. </p><p></p><p></p><p>You can fit 10 easily in that radius. With a core 3.5 metamagic rod of widen spell you could get 20 or 30. You could fit an entire left wing of the Infernal armies in there. Gobs of pitfiends, gelugons, cornugons, all dead *poof* no save, no SR. </p><p>Entire 20th level parties *poof* all dead. Or merely paralyzed then coup de grace if you don't use the PrC. That's balance for you, I guess. </p><p></p><p></p><p>You've provided no actual experience or examinations of the rulesets. In fact you just claim vaguely "a fig/mu is overpowered" while I've provided an example of a core 3.5 cleric with a handful of magic items and a core 3.5 PrC that dwarfs anything seen in previous editions. </p><p>I don't know what you mean by "most basic 3e character" and most "tricked out 1e/2e character. </p><p>As far as I can tell the most "tricked out 1e/2e character" is a complete chump compared to a core rules 3.5 cleric with one spell and a hankering for caster level increase. If I were to go truly non-core rules we could easily kill hextor as a standard action. </p><p>Or have fun with 1-->16 power attack ratios and spells like shivering touch. </p><p></p><p>I've seen all editions of the game, I play a core 3rd edition game because I like the rules not because I think the rules are in any way "better balanced" than previous editions. Any claim to that effect is erroneous. 3rd edition characters are <strong> much </strong> more powerful than previous edition characters. The flexibility inherent in the system that allows you to increase ability scores without limits that always net you benefit is enough to prove that point. The flexibility inherent in a feats and skills and level for level multiclassing system is more than enough to prove that point. It's the <strong> quantitative nature </strong> of the system that allows this. Everything is the bigger bonus and the bigger bonus is everything.</p><p>I can't even pick up a single 3rd edition or worse 3.5 supplement and find something that isn't broken in some horrible fashion or another. You're hamstrung to either re-write, ban, cross your fingers the players won't notice it or just forget about the whole supplement idea in the first place. I</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DungeonMaster, post: 1999308, member: 27431"] That's a good way of reasoning - I guess I could say you've never seen a fig/mu in actual play and that destroys your entire argument as well? Gestahlts are insane. They're 3.5 too. PrC are omnipresent. You know what I mean. Do it casually, no dice rolls, like in 3.5. So if I apply the same logic as above all items are optional in 1st edition and up to the DM? Even with those items you don't kill balrogs, pitfiends, gelugons and the whole host of Type whatever devils and demons in one round without rolling a single die, no save no SR. The 19th level MU has to contend with 60% magic resistance and is not even CLOSE to as damaging as the cleric. Try again if you really want but I'll be ultimately surprised if you can come even close to Andy Collin's uber broken holy word and the general 3.5 trend to not label caster level increase. Core 3.5 DMG PrC. Just like the I don't know, Eldricht Knight? that screams of fig/mu to me. You can fit 10 easily in that radius. With a core 3.5 metamagic rod of widen spell you could get 20 or 30. You could fit an entire left wing of the Infernal armies in there. Gobs of pitfiends, gelugons, cornugons, all dead *poof* no save, no SR. Entire 20th level parties *poof* all dead. Or merely paralyzed then coup de grace if you don't use the PrC. That's balance for you, I guess. You've provided no actual experience or examinations of the rulesets. In fact you just claim vaguely "a fig/mu is overpowered" while I've provided an example of a core 3.5 cleric with a handful of magic items and a core 3.5 PrC that dwarfs anything seen in previous editions. I don't know what you mean by "most basic 3e character" and most "tricked out 1e/2e character. As far as I can tell the most "tricked out 1e/2e character" is a complete chump compared to a core rules 3.5 cleric with one spell and a hankering for caster level increase. If I were to go truly non-core rules we could easily kill hextor as a standard action. Or have fun with 1-->16 power attack ratios and spells like shivering touch. I've seen all editions of the game, I play a core 3rd edition game because I like the rules not because I think the rules are in any way "better balanced" than previous editions. Any claim to that effect is erroneous. 3rd edition characters are [B] much [/B] more powerful than previous edition characters. The flexibility inherent in the system that allows you to increase ability scores without limits that always net you benefit is enough to prove that point. The flexibility inherent in a feats and skills and level for level multiclassing system is more than enough to prove that point. It's the [B] quantitative nature [/B] of the system that allows this. Everything is the bigger bonus and the bigger bonus is everything. I can't even pick up a single 3rd edition or worse 3.5 supplement and find something that isn't broken in some horrible fashion or another. You're hamstrung to either re-write, ban, cross your fingers the players won't notice it or just forget about the whole supplement idea in the first place. I [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Is 3rd edition too "quantitative"
Top