Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Is 5e Basically Becoming Pathfinder 2e?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Crimson Binome" data-source="post: 7253043" data-attributes="member: 6775031"><p>Fourth edition was marketed as a standardized experience, so players could jump between tables without having to learn new rules. Every book that they put out was considered a core book, and you were supposed to allow everything in every game. That was their selling point.</p><p></p><p>Fifth edition was marketed as a return to variations by table. "Rulings, not rules" meant that the DM was empowered to run the game however they wanted to. <em>None</em> of the classes or races in the book were assumed. <em>Any</em> combination of materials, whether published or homebrewed, was considered equally valid. If you wanted to play without feats, or without multiclassing, or with only certain feats and class combinations available, then that was entirely <em>encouraged</em>. <em>That</em> was the selling point.</p><p></p><p>If anyone suggests that there's a "correct" combination of options to use, then that's a problem in the community. That idea needs to be rejected as loudly as possible if the game is going to survive in its intended form, without just becoming another Pathfinder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Crimson Binome, post: 7253043, member: 6775031"] Fourth edition was marketed as a standardized experience, so players could jump between tables without having to learn new rules. Every book that they put out was considered a core book, and you were supposed to allow everything in every game. That was their selling point. Fifth edition was marketed as a return to variations by table. "Rulings, not rules" meant that the DM was empowered to run the game however they wanted to. [I]None[/I] of the classes or races in the book were assumed. [I]Any[/I] combination of materials, whether published or homebrewed, was considered equally valid. If you wanted to play without feats, or without multiclassing, or with only certain feats and class combinations available, then that was entirely [I]encouraged[/I]. [I]That[/I] was the selling point. If anyone suggests that there's a "correct" combination of options to use, then that's a problem in the community. That idea needs to be rejected as loudly as possible if the game is going to survive in its intended form, without just becoming another Pathfinder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Is 5e Basically Becoming Pathfinder 2e?
Top