Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is 5e being too stingy on fluff?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 7803849" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I've been under the impression for 5 years now that 5e actually increased the importance of "fluff" compared to the previous 2 editions, by fluff meaning everything not mechanics-related: narrative, descriptions, artwork... 5e Monster Manual was definitely an improvement for me. </p><p></p><p>5e books are lighter than 3e books, there is definitely less focus on numbers and stats. There is also in general a much lower words count in books of similar number of pages (just compare the font size), and here is where things become iffy...</p><p></p><p>I've always praised the lower word count in rulesbook. It means the game is more solid, rules are clearer, and CORE 5e doesn't feel a bit lighter to me than CORE 3e in terms of what players and DMs can do with it. </p><p></p><p>On the other hand I don't get the same good feeling about settings material. There is nothing around for 5e nearly as valuable as older editions settings sourcebooks. I wasn't much into the game in the glorious era of 2e, but in 3e there were very valuable settings books like FRCS, ECS, Dragonlance, Ravenloft, Rokugan... I still read that a lot of people use those old books for fluff, andso do I. </p><p></p><p>I know that 5e doesn't have nearly the same release schedule as 3e, but that's not what I have in mind: it's not about WotC releasing very few settings books, it's about the fact that when they do, these books actually have very little information compared to similar books of the past. </p><p></p><p>For instance, any regional FR book of 3e easily contains more fluff information (history, locales, NPC...) than SCAG, which is the only FR book for 5e. Ravnica is essentially a regional book of the world of MtG, in the 3e era they would have started with a more comprehensive book of the world at large.</p><p></p><p>It wouldn't be a problem if these slim books were part of a series, but inserted in 5e slow release schedule, they give me a feeling of always only getting "previews" of settings, which will be fleshed out more later on. </p><p></p><p>The FRCS and RCS of 3e gave me instead the feeling that I could game with those for decades. And in fact... I am still using them!!</p><p></p><p>I don't know if it's just me, but I wonder how the others feel about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 7803849, member: 1465"] I've been under the impression for 5 years now that 5e actually increased the importance of "fluff" compared to the previous 2 editions, by fluff meaning everything not mechanics-related: narrative, descriptions, artwork... 5e Monster Manual was definitely an improvement for me. 5e books are lighter than 3e books, there is definitely less focus on numbers and stats. There is also in general a much lower words count in books of similar number of pages (just compare the font size), and here is where things become iffy... I've always praised the lower word count in rulesbook. It means the game is more solid, rules are clearer, and CORE 5e doesn't feel a bit lighter to me than CORE 3e in terms of what players and DMs can do with it. On the other hand I don't get the same good feeling about settings material. There is nothing around for 5e nearly as valuable as older editions settings sourcebooks. I wasn't much into the game in the glorious era of 2e, but in 3e there were very valuable settings books like FRCS, ECS, Dragonlance, Ravenloft, Rokugan... I still read that a lot of people use those old books for fluff, andso do I. I know that 5e doesn't have nearly the same release schedule as 3e, but that's not what I have in mind: it's not about WotC releasing very few settings books, it's about the fact that when they do, these books actually have very little information compared to similar books of the past. For instance, any regional FR book of 3e easily contains more fluff information (history, locales, NPC...) than SCAG, which is the only FR book for 5e. Ravnica is essentially a regional book of the world of MtG, in the 3e era they would have started with a more comprehensive book of the world at large. It wouldn't be a problem if these slim books were part of a series, but inserted in 5e slow release schedule, they give me a feeling of always only getting "previews" of settings, which will be fleshed out more later on. The FRCS and RCS of 3e gave me instead the feeling that I could game with those for decades. And in fact... I am still using them!! I don't know if it's just me, but I wonder how the others feel about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is 5e being too stingy on fluff?
Top