Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 7931430" data-attributes="member: 93670">You are really backtracking instead of making new points on old discussion points you were involved in &amp; it's kind of obnoxious considering you've been involved in this thread for quite some time, for example you quoting my post <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-5e-the-least-challenging-edition-of-d-d.670422/page-12#post-7925652" target="_blank">here</a> talking about a lot of those mechanical changes towards the tail end of that part of the discussion about how incorporeal traits &amp; many other things changed from 3.5 to 5e.&nbsp; As to your example. of 30+ ac..&nbsp; I go into detail the changes with how incorporeal creatures &amp; the wraith con damage changes from 3.5 to 5e way back <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-5e-the-least-challenging-edition-of-d-d.670422/post-7923755" target="_blank">here</a>&nbsp; on yet another page you were involved in &amp; suggest you educate yourself on that since your making a 3.5 example without understanding the mechanics without understanding how in 3.5 having 3+ac did not mean you had 30+ touch ac.&nbsp; Granted i<a href="https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/67197/what-is-the-highest-possible-ac" target="_blank">n 5e having </a>&nbsp;<a href="https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/67197/what-is-the-highest-possible-ac" target="_blank">30+ a</a>c pretty much does mean you are unhittable outside a 20 because incorporeal creatures like a wraith need a 14 or better&nbsp; just to hit off the rack plate+shield.The fireball thing was discussed earlier too, I'm concerned about the memory problems you are displaying.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 7931430, member: 93670"] You are [I][U]really[/U] [/I]backtracking instead of making new points on old discussion points you were involved in & it's kind of obnoxious considering you've been involved in this thread for quite some time, for example you quoting my post [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-5e-the-least-challenging-edition-of-d-d.670422/page-12#post-7925652']here[/URL] talking about a lot of those mechanical changes towards the tail end of that part of the discussion about how incorporeal traits & many other things changed from 3.5 to 5e. As to your example. of 30+ ac.. I go into detail the changes with how incorporeal creatures & the wraith con damage changes from 3.5 to 5e way back [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/is-5e-the-least-challenging-edition-of-d-d.670422/post-7923755']here[/URL] on yet another page you were involved in & suggest you educate yourself on that since your making a 3.5 example without understanding the mechanics without understanding how in 3.5 having 3+ac did not mean you had 30+ [I]touch[/I] ac. Granted i[URL='https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/67197/what-is-the-highest-possible-ac']n 5e having 30+ a[/URL]c pretty much does mean you are unhittable outside a 20 because incorporeal creatures like a wraith need a 14 or better just to hit off the rack plate+shield. The fireball thing was discussed earlier too, I'm concerned about the memory problems you are displaying. [/QUOTE]

Verification