Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is 5e's Success Actually Bad for Other Games?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Campbell" data-source="post: 8303657" data-attributes="member: 16586"><p>What point are you making here? Are we doing the pissing contest thing?</p><p></p><p>I don't understand this desire people seem to have to treat RPGs as a zero sum thing or try to make comparative claims of quality when it's obvious each game has its own strengths and weaknesses it brings to the table. Why the need to knock down other games and the hobbyists that enjoy them?</p><p></p><p>No one has to like or play any game they have no interest in. That does not mean that they should make broad claims about the relative quality of other games, how difficult they are to learn, how much commitment they require, how narrow they are, and a whole host of inflammatory rhetoric being launched at other games broadly. If people want to get into specific criticism I will be glad to hear them out, but this sort of elitism makes being part of this community difficult for people like me who are fans of the overall genre of games.</p><p></p><p>I like D&D. I have 3 official versions of it on my shelf. Several games like The Nightmares Underneath, Pathfinder Second Edition and Electric Bastionland that are direct descendants of it. I play in a biweekly 5e game that's been going for 3 years now. I prefer running other games, including other descendants of D&D, but I absolutely enjoy playing it.</p><p></p><p>I say all this because there seems to be a bizarre need for many in the broader D&D community and particularly on this site to put broad sections of our overall hobby in boxes so they don't have to deal with them cognitively. To render them utterly irrelevant and deny they possess any value not contained within the sacred texts of D&D. It's dismissive, rude, and elitist. It's also entirely unnecessary. You can like what you like without shame. There's no need to tear other parts of the hobby down in order to justify your love for D&D. You can just love D&D. I do. I'm just polyamorous when it comes to RPGs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Campbell, post: 8303657, member: 16586"] What point are you making here? Are we doing the pissing contest thing? I don't understand this desire people seem to have to treat RPGs as a zero sum thing or try to make comparative claims of quality when it's obvious each game has its own strengths and weaknesses it brings to the table. Why the need to knock down other games and the hobbyists that enjoy them? No one has to like or play any game they have no interest in. That does not mean that they should make broad claims about the relative quality of other games, how difficult they are to learn, how much commitment they require, how narrow they are, and a whole host of inflammatory rhetoric being launched at other games broadly. If people want to get into specific criticism I will be glad to hear them out, but this sort of elitism makes being part of this community difficult for people like me who are fans of the overall genre of games. I like D&D. I have 3 official versions of it on my shelf. Several games like The Nightmares Underneath, Pathfinder Second Edition and Electric Bastionland that are direct descendants of it. I play in a biweekly 5e game that's been going for 3 years now. I prefer running other games, including other descendants of D&D, but I absolutely enjoy playing it. I say all this because there seems to be a bizarre need for many in the broader D&D community and particularly on this site to put broad sections of our overall hobby in boxes so they don't have to deal with them cognitively. To render them utterly irrelevant and deny they possess any value not contained within the sacred texts of D&D. It's dismissive, rude, and elitist. It's also entirely unnecessary. You can like what you like without shame. There's no need to tear other parts of the hobby down in order to justify your love for D&D. You can just love D&D. I do. I'm just polyamorous when it comes to RPGs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Is 5e's Success Actually Bad for Other Games?
Top