Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
is a Fighter/cleric etc less powerful using a shield
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 6902424" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>This example completely ignores the value of ending the fight one full round earlier. That is, it sets a zero value on whatever nastiness the monsters would have done on round four.</p><p></p><p>In reality, chances are that nastiness is much worse than you losing 5 extra hit points. For example, the monster eating the face of the squishy wizard or bard for 6 damage.</p><p></p><p>6 > 5, thus making the offensive option better. </p><p></p><p>Focussing on your offensive instead of your defensive is generally a good idea in a game like D&D.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>There are exceptions, such as the tempest Cleric with Spirit Guardians mentioned above. </p><p></p><p>Our party has such a Cleric. When things become really hairy he spends his action Dodging, letting the spirit guardians do the job for him. Cast at 5th level, they do a pretty good job.</p><p></p><p>He has all the feats and a great Constitution, so DC 10 Concentration checks are an auto-success for him.</p><p></p><p>In this special case, it would be madness to not go for a shield.</p><p></p><p>(To be honest, this isn't really an exception, since it is yet another way of maximizing offense. Since there aren't any real tanking possibility in this game, including aggro mechanics that govern the actions of NPCs, it is almost always substandard to go for a defensive build, when you can go for an offensive build and still get decent defense. Aggression is definitely the name of this game.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 6902424, member: 12731"] This example completely ignores the value of ending the fight one full round earlier. That is, it sets a zero value on whatever nastiness the monsters would have done on round four. In reality, chances are that nastiness is much worse than you losing 5 extra hit points. For example, the monster eating the face of the squishy wizard or bard for 6 damage. 6 > 5, thus making the offensive option better. Focussing on your offensive instead of your defensive is generally a good idea in a game like D&D. --- There are exceptions, such as the tempest Cleric with Spirit Guardians mentioned above. Our party has such a Cleric. When things become really hairy he spends his action Dodging, letting the spirit guardians do the job for him. Cast at 5th level, they do a pretty good job. He has all the feats and a great Constitution, so DC 10 Concentration checks are an auto-success for him. In this special case, it would be madness to not go for a shield. (To be honest, this isn't really an exception, since it is yet another way of maximizing offense. Since there aren't any real tanking possibility in this game, including aggro mechanics that govern the actions of NPCs, it is almost always substandard to go for a defensive build, when you can go for an offensive build and still get decent defense. Aggression is definitely the name of this game.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
is a Fighter/cleric etc less powerful using a shield
Top